Thursday, 8 July 2010
Instablog
Sreeja, Mumbai ,1 July
Blame it on the BMC’s half-hearted efforts, the shopkeepers or the customers, it is raining polythene bags in the city. Go to any local market in the sprawling city, the banned polythene bags are there for all to see.
The local government in Mumbai, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), has intensified its drive against the use of polythene bags due to the fear that the extensive use of the banned product may cause floods as was witnessed on July 26, 2005 in Mumbai. As the rainy season has set in, the BMC has woken up as experts are of the view that the July 2005 deluge was a result of the Mithi River, flowing through the heart of the city, overflowing because garbage had blocked the flow of water.
And to ensure the city’s drains do not choke on garbage and debris, the BMC has decided to impose a fine on people found dumping garbage in them. If anybody is caught throwing garbage in a drain, he or she will have to pay anything between Rs 100 and Rs 5,000 as a fine. For the first time, BMC teams formed in every ward under the ward officer will go around the city keeping an eye out for offenders. The amount of fine will depend on how much garbage an individual dumps. Clean up marshals will also be told to be alert.
There’s no laid-down formula to charge offenders. It depends on how much plastic they are found with. If there are 2-3 plastic bags, we charge Rs500; a big plastic bag is charged Rs100. If vegetable vendor has 6-7 packs with 600 plastic bags in each, the fine goes up.
But in spite of all the BMC’s efforts and the state government banning the product, it is everywhere in the city.There is a blame game going on in the city for the growing plastic bag menace. While the government blame the shopkeepers, they in turn blame the customers. “We are well aware of the law against plastic bags, but what do we do when customers ask us for bags. Why should we lose out on business? We are caught between the BMC’s fine and the customers’ demands,” vendors say.
Who is to be blamed for this extremely pathetic state of affairs on this grave issue?. It is sure, we all are responsible for it.But, primarily though the government had ritually banned the product to assuage the sad feelings of the people after the 2005 deluge, it never implemented the ban in letter and spirit.
The law is there, but implement it. That is the key.
Monday, 10 May 2010
Delhi’s ban on plastic bags gets a quiet burial
Hindustan Times
Avishek G Dastidar
New Delhi, May 10, 2010
Plastic bags are back with a vengeance. Shoppers across Delhi are once again going home with colourful plastic bags full of goodies that they’ve bought.
The shopkeepers have also started stocking them again in blatant violation of the plastic bag ban in place since January 2009. The Delhi government, meanwhile, seems to have turned a blind eye to it.
The latest records filed at the courts show that the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) could not spot more than 115 people using or selling plastic bags in the past 15 months in this city of nearly 2 crore people.
“Enforcing the ban in shops and unorganized sectors has been a problem,” admitted Dharmendra Kumar, Delhi Environment Secretary. “We have fined a number of people but we can’t have constant policing.”
With the government dragging its feet on the ban, one of Delhi’s biggest environmental policy interventions in years—after the introduction of Compressed Natural Gas-based public transport a decade ago—has died a slow death.
While the government claimed that the plastic bags had been weeded out of malls, a random check showed markets in Defence Colony, Janak Puri, INA market, Gole Market and Bengali Market were, as expected, teeming with violators.
Apart from grocery stores and sweet shops, meat shops and fruit vendors mushrooming across localities are bringing the bag back in circulation.
The Delhi government, too, goofed up in its reading of the laws governing the ban.
Sources said the DPCC had earlier asked the MCD to fine violators as per the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. But towards the middle of last year, the DPCC realised that the MCD could not fine anyone as the Environment Protection Act, 1986, which governs the ban, empowers only the state pollution boards for the job.
Thanks to this mix up, the MCD’s citywide reach could not be utilised to penalise violators.
“The government does not appear serious about the ban,” said Vinod Jain, the petitioner who had won the long-drawn case against the “plastic lobby” to force the ban on Delhi. Traders, who circulate the bags through their shops, said the government lost out to the well-organised network of the plastic bag manufacturers.
“Every morning, delivery boys come to the markets and deliver the plastic bags. For traders, it is a matter of availability of a cheap packaging material. Where are the alternate bag makers in this race?” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of Confederation of All India Traders, the biggest traders’ organization in Delhi.
The matter is now in the Supreme Court, where plastic manufacturers have said the ban was illegal, as the government did not carry out mandatory public hearing before the ban.
Avishek G Dastidar
New Delhi, May 10, 2010
Plastic bags are back with a vengeance. Shoppers across Delhi are once again going home with colourful plastic bags full of goodies that they’ve bought.
The shopkeepers have also started stocking them again in blatant violation of the plastic bag ban in place since January 2009. The Delhi government, meanwhile, seems to have turned a blind eye to it.
The latest records filed at the courts show that the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) could not spot more than 115 people using or selling plastic bags in the past 15 months in this city of nearly 2 crore people.
“Enforcing the ban in shops and unorganized sectors has been a problem,” admitted Dharmendra Kumar, Delhi Environment Secretary. “We have fined a number of people but we can’t have constant policing.”
With the government dragging its feet on the ban, one of Delhi’s biggest environmental policy interventions in years—after the introduction of Compressed Natural Gas-based public transport a decade ago—has died a slow death.
While the government claimed that the plastic bags had been weeded out of malls, a random check showed markets in Defence Colony, Janak Puri, INA market, Gole Market and Bengali Market were, as expected, teeming with violators.
Apart from grocery stores and sweet shops, meat shops and fruit vendors mushrooming across localities are bringing the bag back in circulation.
The Delhi government, too, goofed up in its reading of the laws governing the ban.
Sources said the DPCC had earlier asked the MCD to fine violators as per the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. But towards the middle of last year, the DPCC realised that the MCD could not fine anyone as the Environment Protection Act, 1986, which governs the ban, empowers only the state pollution boards for the job.
Thanks to this mix up, the MCD’s citywide reach could not be utilised to penalise violators.
“The government does not appear serious about the ban,” said Vinod Jain, the petitioner who had won the long-drawn case against the “plastic lobby” to force the ban on Delhi. Traders, who circulate the bags through their shops, said the government lost out to the well-organised network of the plastic bag manufacturers.
“Every morning, delivery boys come to the markets and deliver the plastic bags. For traders, it is a matter of availability of a cheap packaging material. Where are the alternate bag makers in this race?” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of Confederation of All India Traders, the biggest traders’ organization in Delhi.
The matter is now in the Supreme Court, where plastic manufacturers have said the ban was illegal, as the government did not carry out mandatory public hearing before the ban.
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Hindustan Times
Don’t waste their efforts
Bharati Chaturvedi
April 14, 2010
The recent fires in Delhi’s Mundka plastic scrapyard and the radioactive leak at the Mayapuri scrap market are a wake-up call for Indian cities to find innovative ways of safe scrap trading.
The scrap trade in Delhi is one of the biggest and most robust in India. Before the ascent of China, in the mid-1990s, it was believed to be one of the biggest trading spots in Asia. Approximately 2,000 tonnes of Delhi’s scrap is recycled here. In addition, waste from Pune also comes here. All of this rests on the work of a giant army of over 80,000 wastepickers, over 25,000 small scrap dealers, a few thousand itinerant buyers and over 50,000 sorters and bailers, apart from e-waste dismantlers.
A World Bank estimate says that over 1 per cent of the population of a big city in the developed world comprises waste recyclers. In India, this sector, predominantly informal, works like a pyramid, with wastepickers at the bottom and the reprocessors at the top, employing over 15 lakh Indians. This is India’s recycling mechanism — driven by the enterprise of the poor who are largely unrecognised and face enormous health risks. It saves huge amounts of money for the various municipalities.
Despite the Delhi incidents, they are a city’s allies, not a nuisance and our policy makers know that. The National Environment Policy, 2006, and the National Action Plan on Climate Change, 2009, both specifically mention the importance of the informal recycling sector and urge government agencies to work with them. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG) report of 2008 indicted some municipalities for making their work harder instead of collaborating with them.
A UN-Habitat report released at the World Urban Forum a few weeks ago points out that informal recycling is a global phenomenon. Policies and research aside, we must work with the recycling sector because of the sheer importance of its work in keeping our cities clean and waste recycled economically. Contrast this with New York, where recycling stopped briefly because of the expense involved. Besides, there are hundreds of urban poor whose livelihoods depend on the recycling industry.
How to make the sector safe? For a start, every municipality must undertake a census, starting with the scrap shops. These shops must be licensed and trained to set up simple fire safety systems. The informal sector finds it hard to invest in fire safety systems if it’s stuck with forced “illegality.” Such shops must be helped to set up a paper trail for all metals, cables, intact items and bulk purchases made. This will help the authorities to track the source of origin of noxious items. They should also have access to authorised help to implement these and other performance standards, and to solve other problems.
But most of all, they need adequate space. Electronic waste is dismantled in the living rooms of the poor because there is no other space. In Delhi, the plots for plastics at Tigri Kalan are tiny. Expecting a scrap shop to move into these is like asking a man wearing size 9 shoes to squeeze into size 5. Besides, small scrap dealers need localised space — nearly six are required for a 100,000 population. In Delhi, the Masterplan 2010 allocates space for recycling but bans junk shops that trade in anything but glass and paper. This is absurd. How can a city indirectly ban recycling — a process the Municipal Waste Rules of 2000 mandate?
The Delhi government has to push for re-drawing a realistic masterplan that enables, not impedes recycling. Only when there is basic livelihood security, and an attempt to draw in these players participatively into their own safety, can we expect to sustainably upgrade their work and green our cities.
Bharati Chaturvedi is Director, Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group, New Delhi
The views expressed by the author are personal
Bharati Chaturvedi
April 14, 2010
The recent fires in Delhi’s Mundka plastic scrapyard and the radioactive leak at the Mayapuri scrap market are a wake-up call for Indian cities to find innovative ways of safe scrap trading.
The scrap trade in Delhi is one of the biggest and most robust in India. Before the ascent of China, in the mid-1990s, it was believed to be one of the biggest trading spots in Asia. Approximately 2,000 tonnes of Delhi’s scrap is recycled here. In addition, waste from Pune also comes here. All of this rests on the work of a giant army of over 80,000 wastepickers, over 25,000 small scrap dealers, a few thousand itinerant buyers and over 50,000 sorters and bailers, apart from e-waste dismantlers.
A World Bank estimate says that over 1 per cent of the population of a big city in the developed world comprises waste recyclers. In India, this sector, predominantly informal, works like a pyramid, with wastepickers at the bottom and the reprocessors at the top, employing over 15 lakh Indians. This is India’s recycling mechanism — driven by the enterprise of the poor who are largely unrecognised and face enormous health risks. It saves huge amounts of money for the various municipalities.
Despite the Delhi incidents, they are a city’s allies, not a nuisance and our policy makers know that. The National Environment Policy, 2006, and the National Action Plan on Climate Change, 2009, both specifically mention the importance of the informal recycling sector and urge government agencies to work with them. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG) report of 2008 indicted some municipalities for making their work harder instead of collaborating with them.
A UN-Habitat report released at the World Urban Forum a few weeks ago points out that informal recycling is a global phenomenon. Policies and research aside, we must work with the recycling sector because of the sheer importance of its work in keeping our cities clean and waste recycled economically. Contrast this with New York, where recycling stopped briefly because of the expense involved. Besides, there are hundreds of urban poor whose livelihoods depend on the recycling industry.
How to make the sector safe? For a start, every municipality must undertake a census, starting with the scrap shops. These shops must be licensed and trained to set up simple fire safety systems. The informal sector finds it hard to invest in fire safety systems if it’s stuck with forced “illegality.” Such shops must be helped to set up a paper trail for all metals, cables, intact items and bulk purchases made. This will help the authorities to track the source of origin of noxious items. They should also have access to authorised help to implement these and other performance standards, and to solve other problems.
But most of all, they need adequate space. Electronic waste is dismantled in the living rooms of the poor because there is no other space. In Delhi, the plots for plastics at Tigri Kalan are tiny. Expecting a scrap shop to move into these is like asking a man wearing size 9 shoes to squeeze into size 5. Besides, small scrap dealers need localised space — nearly six are required for a 100,000 population. In Delhi, the Masterplan 2010 allocates space for recycling but bans junk shops that trade in anything but glass and paper. This is absurd. How can a city indirectly ban recycling — a process the Municipal Waste Rules of 2000 mandate?
The Delhi government has to push for re-drawing a realistic masterplan that enables, not impedes recycling. Only when there is basic livelihood security, and an attempt to draw in these players participatively into their own safety, can we expect to sustainably upgrade their work and green our cities.
Bharati Chaturvedi is Director, Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group, New Delhi
The views expressed by the author are personal
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
The Hindu, 30 March 2010
Plastic bag ban remains only on paper, says KSPCB chief
Staff Reporter
Bangalore: Despite the ban on plastic bags with less than 20 microns thickness, the State Government has not been able to prevent the use and disposal of this environmentally hazardous material, A.S. Sadashivaiah, Chairman of Karnataka State Pollution Control Board, has said.
Karnataka has failed to regulate the material on two counts — first in preventing the plastic bags from entering the State (either from other States or from local manufacturers); and second, in safely disposing of the material, Mr. Sadashivaiah said on Monday. He was speaking at a national workshop on Plastic Waste Management Strategies for a Clean Environment, organised by the Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology (CIPET).
In Bangalore, for instance, 80 per cent of the 150 tonnes of plastic waste disposed of everyday comprises plastic bags thinner than 20 microns. “This goes unsegregated at the domestic level and is not picked up by waste collectors either as it cannot be recycled,” he said. Mr. Sadashivaiah added that district vigilance teams, made up of environmental officers and headed by Deputy Commissioners, set up to monitor pollution, have been instructed to be “more vigilant” about the use and disposal of plastic bags.
Plastic ‘singled out'
Expressing a rather contrary view, Director-General of CIPET S.K. Nayak said that plastic was being “singled out” as the cause of all environmental woes. “Plastic bags happen to be colourful and fly around, which is probably why they are more conspicuous than other pollutants,” he said. Mr. Nayak added that plastic consumed less energy during production than paper, and produced less greenhouse gases when disposed of. It was important, he said, however, that plastic be managed through the collaborative efforts of the government, private companies and non-government organisations.
Kanwar Pal, Secretary, Department of Ecology and Environment, said that banning plastic was no solution and added that the answer to the menace lay in efficient management and in following the motto of reduce, reuse, recover and recycle. A worrying trend was the burning of plastic as it released harmful chemicals such as and Benzo(a)Pyrene and toxic dioxides.
Staff Reporter
Bangalore: Despite the ban on plastic bags with less than 20 microns thickness, the State Government has not been able to prevent the use and disposal of this environmentally hazardous material, A.S. Sadashivaiah, Chairman of Karnataka State Pollution Control Board, has said.
Karnataka has failed to regulate the material on two counts — first in preventing the plastic bags from entering the State (either from other States or from local manufacturers); and second, in safely disposing of the material, Mr. Sadashivaiah said on Monday. He was speaking at a national workshop on Plastic Waste Management Strategies for a Clean Environment, organised by the Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology (CIPET).
In Bangalore, for instance, 80 per cent of the 150 tonnes of plastic waste disposed of everyday comprises plastic bags thinner than 20 microns. “This goes unsegregated at the domestic level and is not picked up by waste collectors either as it cannot be recycled,” he said. Mr. Sadashivaiah added that district vigilance teams, made up of environmental officers and headed by Deputy Commissioners, set up to monitor pollution, have been instructed to be “more vigilant” about the use and disposal of plastic bags.
Plastic ‘singled out'
Expressing a rather contrary view, Director-General of CIPET S.K. Nayak said that plastic was being “singled out” as the cause of all environmental woes. “Plastic bags happen to be colourful and fly around, which is probably why they are more conspicuous than other pollutants,” he said. Mr. Nayak added that plastic consumed less energy during production than paper, and produced less greenhouse gases when disposed of. It was important, he said, however, that plastic be managed through the collaborative efforts of the government, private companies and non-government organisations.
Kanwar Pal, Secretary, Department of Ecology and Environment, said that banning plastic was no solution and added that the answer to the menace lay in efficient management and in following the motto of reduce, reuse, recover and recycle. A worrying trend was the burning of plastic as it released harmful chemicals such as and Benzo(a)Pyrene and toxic dioxides.
Sunday, 7 March 2010
Times Online March 7th
Aloha! We can clear up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch
Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony Environmental, explains how he can bring back Hawaii’s golden sands
ONCE a five-mile stretch of golden sand, Kamilo beach on the island of Hawaii has become a huge rubbish dump of carrier bags, cigarette lighters, broken toys and other discarded plastic that scars the landscape and could cause lasting damage to the environment.
A British company is aiming to make such detritus a thing of the past. Symphony Environmental has created a substance that can be added to plastic materials to speed up their degradation time from several decades to just a few months.
“We call it superfast biodegradation. All plastic will eventually biodegrade but our technology dramatically accelerates the process,” said Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony.
The litter that washes up on Kamilo mostly comes from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, an area of the ocean estimated by some to be twice the size of Texas, where 100m tonnes of floating plastic rubbish poses a threat to thousands of marine animals.
Symphony, based in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, claims most plastic made with its technology would degrade before it ever reached that part of the world.
The special additive, called d2w, is put into plastic products when they are being manufactured. It works by weakening the carbon bonds, lowering the material’s molecular weight and eventually causing a loss of strength. The plastic can be given a set lifespan, depending on what purpose it is ultimately intended for.
“The point of this is that a bin liner, for example, may require a useful life of 18 months before beginning to lose its strength, whereas a bread bag may require only a few weeks,” said Stephen.
It has been a fight to get the company where it is today.
Founded in 1995, it began creating the technology in partnership with EPI, the environmental products group, in 1998. Their agreement was scrapped in 2003 and EPI tried in the High Court to prevent Symphony going it alone. The claims were dismissed, leaving Symphony free to market and develop its technology.
The recent switch to a licensing model has helped the AIM-listed business make a small profit for the first time. The d2w logo now appears on plastic packaging in 70 countries for companies including Sony and Nokia. In Britain, Barclays, Tesco and JD Sports use Symphony products.
The company has faced stern opposition from rivals. The plastics industry is split into two camps — those that back “oxo-biodegradable” products, such as the d2w range, which break down with exposure to air alone; and those that back “bio-degradable” goods, which rely on specific conditions, such as burial in the ground, to kick-start the process.
“It has been a vicious war and sadly in some cases the bio-producers have convinced British farmers that crop-based plastics are best,” said Stephen. “That is wrong, though, because when they are recycled they give off methane [a potent greenhouse gas].”
He said Symphony is working on a superfast version of its technology that will allow plastics to degrade in less than a month.
Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony Environmental, explains how he can bring back Hawaii’s golden sands
ONCE a five-mile stretch of golden sand, Kamilo beach on the island of Hawaii has become a huge rubbish dump of carrier bags, cigarette lighters, broken toys and other discarded plastic that scars the landscape and could cause lasting damage to the environment.
A British company is aiming to make such detritus a thing of the past. Symphony Environmental has created a substance that can be added to plastic materials to speed up their degradation time from several decades to just a few months.
“We call it superfast biodegradation. All plastic will eventually biodegrade but our technology dramatically accelerates the process,” said Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony.
The litter that washes up on Kamilo mostly comes from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, an area of the ocean estimated by some to be twice the size of Texas, where 100m tonnes of floating plastic rubbish poses a threat to thousands of marine animals.
Symphony, based in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, claims most plastic made with its technology would degrade before it ever reached that part of the world.
The special additive, called d2w, is put into plastic products when they are being manufactured. It works by weakening the carbon bonds, lowering the material’s molecular weight and eventually causing a loss of strength. The plastic can be given a set lifespan, depending on what purpose it is ultimately intended for.
“The point of this is that a bin liner, for example, may require a useful life of 18 months before beginning to lose its strength, whereas a bread bag may require only a few weeks,” said Stephen.
It has been a fight to get the company where it is today.
Founded in 1995, it began creating the technology in partnership with EPI, the environmental products group, in 1998. Their agreement was scrapped in 2003 and EPI tried in the High Court to prevent Symphony going it alone. The claims were dismissed, leaving Symphony free to market and develop its technology.
The recent switch to a licensing model has helped the AIM-listed business make a small profit for the first time. The d2w logo now appears on plastic packaging in 70 countries for companies including Sony and Nokia. In Britain, Barclays, Tesco and JD Sports use Symphony products.
The company has faced stern opposition from rivals. The plastics industry is split into two camps — those that back “oxo-biodegradable” products, such as the d2w range, which break down with exposure to air alone; and those that back “bio-degradable” goods, which rely on specific conditions, such as burial in the ground, to kick-start the process.
“It has been a vicious war and sadly in some cases the bio-producers have convinced British farmers that crop-based plastics are best,” said Stephen. “That is wrong, though, because when they are recycled they give off methane [a potent greenhouse gas].”
He said Symphony is working on a superfast version of its technology that will allow plastics to degrade in less than a month.
Saturday, 6 March 2010
Latest developments
JAMMU & KASHMIR
Luibeg are delighted to announce that 21st Century Packaging of Delhi – an ISO 9001-2000 Certified Company and major plastic manufacturer has made an important break-through in supplying d2w oxo-biodegradable bags and packaging to a number of customers in Jammu & Kashmir. Through the magnificent efforts of the 21st Century Packaging Team, Luibeg are the first Organization to introduce the oxo- biodegradable technology to this Region.
21st Century Packaging has been supplying d2w products to major customers in Jammu & Kashmir for over 12 months and product samples have been fully and successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the U.K.
Further information will be released shortly regarding the customers who use d2w products.
IN ADDITION
To further our development and prominence in Jammu & Kashmir, Luibeg are very pleased to confirm that we have appointed Swastik Packaging Industries of Jammu as our sole Agent and Distributor for Jammu & Kashmir. The Chairman of this Group, Mr. Pawan K. Shastri has been in the plastic manufacturing industry for many years and is also a Distributor for a major polymer manufacturer. Mr. Shastri has extensive knowledge of the plastic industry and market, and is well acquainted with the manufacturers throughout Jammu & Kashmir. He brings a wealth of experience to our Group and over the past year, has been instrumental in creating awareness of the oxo technology and d2w brand to the State Government and Pollution Board, where extensive discussions and negotiations have been ongoing to ensure that the technology is fully accepted for use in J & K. Swastik Packaging Industries will be using d2w additives in their product manufacturing and have completed trial production runs using d2w and all samples have been successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the UK.
Luibeg are delighted to announce that 21st Century Packaging of Delhi – an ISO 9001-2000 Certified Company and major plastic manufacturer has made an important break-through in supplying d2w oxo-biodegradable bags and packaging to a number of customers in Jammu & Kashmir. Through the magnificent efforts of the 21st Century Packaging Team, Luibeg are the first Organization to introduce the oxo- biodegradable technology to this Region.
21st Century Packaging has been supplying d2w products to major customers in Jammu & Kashmir for over 12 months and product samples have been fully and successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the U.K.
Further information will be released shortly regarding the customers who use d2w products.
IN ADDITION
To further our development and prominence in Jammu & Kashmir, Luibeg are very pleased to confirm that we have appointed Swastik Packaging Industries of Jammu as our sole Agent and Distributor for Jammu & Kashmir. The Chairman of this Group, Mr. Pawan K. Shastri has been in the plastic manufacturing industry for many years and is also a Distributor for a major polymer manufacturer. Mr. Shastri has extensive knowledge of the plastic industry and market, and is well acquainted with the manufacturers throughout Jammu & Kashmir. He brings a wealth of experience to our Group and over the past year, has been instrumental in creating awareness of the oxo technology and d2w brand to the State Government and Pollution Board, where extensive discussions and negotiations have been ongoing to ensure that the technology is fully accepted for use in J & K. Swastik Packaging Industries will be using d2w additives in their product manufacturing and have completed trial production runs using d2w and all samples have been successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the UK.
Sunday, 7 February 2010
High Paxton's Blog
More on Killer Plastic – The indigestability of plastic bags.
By Hugh Paxton
“In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!”
Seeing these hideous images of choked seabirds from Midway atoll in your article The Long Arm Of Plastic reminds me to put my mouth where my money is and talk about the merits of biodegradable plastic. The sad fact is that improper disposal of waste plastic is having a very deleterious effect on a lot of wildlife, it is truly an international problem of epic proportions.
Wouldn’t it be awful if the sea turtles which managed to survive the cataclysmic termination of the dinosaurs could be hastened to extinction by plastic bags? Yet that is exactly what is happening.
Many species of sea turtles that munch upon jelly fish for a living are cutting short their sweet lives by choking their alimentary tracts with plastic bags. Sadly, they can’t distinguish between a healthy coelenterate supper and the diaphanous floating billows of plastic bags.
Even if they mistake just 1 in a 1000 meals – the sheer quantity of plastic waste in our oceans coupled with its very slow decomposition, the turtles’ need for a high rate of consumption ( due to the low nutritional content of their jelly-fish prey) and their slow breeding rate means that the odds are stacked heavily against sea turtle survival.
Whether these bags were carelessly dumped or just plucked by the wind from trash cans, heaps, picnic bags or boats matters little to the turtles. What does matter, and this matters a lot, is the size of the jetsam and the amount of time it remains an environmental hazard after it has served its useful purpose to humanity.
Thankfully there is a solution; it is to replace conventional long-lived plastics with plastics that are programmed to biodegrade in about 6 months under normal conditions of careless disposal or on an open rubbish dump!
Symphony Environmental plc add proprietary granules to plastic in the manufacturing process that retain the strength of the plastic during its short span of useful service to mankind and then enable decomposition to set in from exposure to moisture and air when decomposition becomes the new priority.On their website Symphony claims:
“Our d2w® additive put into the plastic at the extrusion stage will make the finished product “oxo-biodegradable” so that it will degrade and disappear in a short timescale, leaving no fragments, no methane and no harmful residues.Degradability is not a disposal option – you can still re-use and recycle – it is low cost insurance against the accumulation of plastic waste in the environment.”
Brilliant.
Symphony franchises its proprietary biodegradable plastic technology internationally and I am happy to say that they are rapidly expanding their operations and now have customers in Europe, North, South and Central America, The Middle East, India and The Far East.
In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!
While I may not have enough shares in Symphony to make much of a financial difference to me, I know that every biodegradable plastic bag that replaces a non-biodegradable one is one less choking hazard for our Chelonian friends.
By Hugh Paxton
“In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!”
Seeing these hideous images of choked seabirds from Midway atoll in your article The Long Arm Of Plastic reminds me to put my mouth where my money is and talk about the merits of biodegradable plastic. The sad fact is that improper disposal of waste plastic is having a very deleterious effect on a lot of wildlife, it is truly an international problem of epic proportions.
Wouldn’t it be awful if the sea turtles which managed to survive the cataclysmic termination of the dinosaurs could be hastened to extinction by plastic bags? Yet that is exactly what is happening.
Many species of sea turtles that munch upon jelly fish for a living are cutting short their sweet lives by choking their alimentary tracts with plastic bags. Sadly, they can’t distinguish between a healthy coelenterate supper and the diaphanous floating billows of plastic bags.
Even if they mistake just 1 in a 1000 meals – the sheer quantity of plastic waste in our oceans coupled with its very slow decomposition, the turtles’ need for a high rate of consumption ( due to the low nutritional content of their jelly-fish prey) and their slow breeding rate means that the odds are stacked heavily against sea turtle survival.
Whether these bags were carelessly dumped or just plucked by the wind from trash cans, heaps, picnic bags or boats matters little to the turtles. What does matter, and this matters a lot, is the size of the jetsam and the amount of time it remains an environmental hazard after it has served its useful purpose to humanity.
Thankfully there is a solution; it is to replace conventional long-lived plastics with plastics that are programmed to biodegrade in about 6 months under normal conditions of careless disposal or on an open rubbish dump!
Symphony Environmental plc add proprietary granules to plastic in the manufacturing process that retain the strength of the plastic during its short span of useful service to mankind and then enable decomposition to set in from exposure to moisture and air when decomposition becomes the new priority.On their website Symphony claims:
“Our d2w® additive put into the plastic at the extrusion stage will make the finished product “oxo-biodegradable” so that it will degrade and disappear in a short timescale, leaving no fragments, no methane and no harmful residues.Degradability is not a disposal option – you can still re-use and recycle – it is low cost insurance against the accumulation of plastic waste in the environment.”
Brilliant.
Symphony franchises its proprietary biodegradable plastic technology internationally and I am happy to say that they are rapidly expanding their operations and now have customers in Europe, North, South and Central America, The Middle East, India and The Far East.
In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!
While I may not have enough shares in Symphony to make much of a financial difference to me, I know that every biodegradable plastic bag that replaces a non-biodegradable one is one less choking hazard for our Chelonian friends.
Plastics News.com
Oxo-biodegradable additive suppliers rebut critics
By Frank Esposito
PLASTICS NEWS STAFF
Posted February 2, 2010
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Updated Feb. 4, 1:25 p.m. ET) --
A pair of oxo-biodegradable plastic additive makers have fired back at the Society of the Plastics Industry’s Bioplastics Council over claims of biodegradability.
The Bioplastics Council had questioned such claims in a 5-page position paper released Jan. 28, saying that “the issue is one of claiming biodegradation where there is not data to support those claims, or to prove biodegradability as per accepted standards.”
In a Feb. 1 rebuttal, officials with additives maker EPI Environmental Products Inc. of Vancouver, British Columbia, said the Bioplastics Council and a similar European trade group “are inherently biased against competing technologies, and … have once again sought to discredit oxo-biodegradable plastics technology through their ongoing campaign of misinformation and rumor-mongering.”
EPI officials battle on for five pages, disputing the council’s claims and adding several claims defending its own products.
A similar rebuttal from additives maker Symphony Environmental Technologies plc of Borehamwood, England, was less polite.
“The increasingly desperate efforts of the hydro-biodegradable (vegetable-based or ‘compostable’) plastic companies to rubbish oxo-biodegradable plastics are becoming laughable,” Symphony officials said in a Feb. 1 release. “Their latest tactic is to form themselves in the U.S.A. into a very official-sounding organization called the ‘Bioplastics Council’ and to attach it to the respected Society of the Plastics Industry.”
“This ‘Council’ has recently issued a Position Paper which repeats the allegations made against oxo-biodegradable plastics in July 2009 by an organization called ‘European Bioplastics.’ Not surprising really — as they are financed by some of the same companies for the same purpose.”
EPI officials had disputed similar claims made by European Bioplastics in August.
In response to the criticism from EPI and Symphony, the SPI Bioplastics Council issued a statement:
“The SPI Bioplastics Council’s position paper on oxo-biodegradable technologies was drafted with considerable thought and deliberation, and was released on January 28 after extensive review and due diligence. We strongly stand by the position taken, and reiterate that it is the duty of industry to provide consumers with clear information supported by scientific data so that marketing claims do in fact match product results.”
The Bioplastics Council is comprised of eight member companies: Arkema, BASF Corp., Cereplast Inc., DuPont Co., NatureWorks LLC, PolyOne Corp., Teknor Apex and Telles, the joint venture company of Metabolix and Archer Daniels Midland. Seven of those eight — with the exception of Teknor Apex — also are members of European Bioplastics, a trade group formed in 2006.
Two other recycling-focused trade groups – the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) and the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) also have raised concerns about oxo-biodegradable additives. APR in particular has challenged additives producers to produce evidence that their products won’t ultimately weaken products made from recycled resins.
Steve Alexander, executive director of APR, said degradable additives have at least two environmental hurdles to overcome.
“First, do the additives in fact lead to degradation of plastic molecules to carbon dioxide and water? Doubts and claims abound, particularly about timeframes. While such discussions are interesting and necessary, we as citizens wonder if degradation leads to environmental benefit on its own or is degradation an environmental negative and initiation of new environmental issues. We believe the greater environmental benefit and sustainable action is to use the plastic molecule again and not waste it,” Alexander said in a statement.
“Second, and more pertinent to our interests in plastics recycling, we wonder how the additives affect the process of recycling, the making of the next item from recycled plastic, and the service life of the next item, Alexander said. “Premature demise of items made of recycled plastic which contain degradable additives is not helpful. The early failure of some items impacts the reputation of all.”
Alexander said APR is pleased that some companies, such as Symphony, have excluded PET as a targeted resin, and that some are proceeding to test their materials per the APR degradable additives protocol.
By Frank Esposito
PLASTICS NEWS STAFF
Posted February 2, 2010
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Updated Feb. 4, 1:25 p.m. ET) --
A pair of oxo-biodegradable plastic additive makers have fired back at the Society of the Plastics Industry’s Bioplastics Council over claims of biodegradability.
The Bioplastics Council had questioned such claims in a 5-page position paper released Jan. 28, saying that “the issue is one of claiming biodegradation where there is not data to support those claims, or to prove biodegradability as per accepted standards.”
In a Feb. 1 rebuttal, officials with additives maker EPI Environmental Products Inc. of Vancouver, British Columbia, said the Bioplastics Council and a similar European trade group “are inherently biased against competing technologies, and … have once again sought to discredit oxo-biodegradable plastics technology through their ongoing campaign of misinformation and rumor-mongering.”
EPI officials battle on for five pages, disputing the council’s claims and adding several claims defending its own products.
A similar rebuttal from additives maker Symphony Environmental Technologies plc of Borehamwood, England, was less polite.
“The increasingly desperate efforts of the hydro-biodegradable (vegetable-based or ‘compostable’) plastic companies to rubbish oxo-biodegradable plastics are becoming laughable,” Symphony officials said in a Feb. 1 release. “Their latest tactic is to form themselves in the U.S.A. into a very official-sounding organization called the ‘Bioplastics Council’ and to attach it to the respected Society of the Plastics Industry.”
“This ‘Council’ has recently issued a Position Paper which repeats the allegations made against oxo-biodegradable plastics in July 2009 by an organization called ‘European Bioplastics.’ Not surprising really — as they are financed by some of the same companies for the same purpose.”
EPI officials had disputed similar claims made by European Bioplastics in August.
In response to the criticism from EPI and Symphony, the SPI Bioplastics Council issued a statement:
“The SPI Bioplastics Council’s position paper on oxo-biodegradable technologies was drafted with considerable thought and deliberation, and was released on January 28 after extensive review and due diligence. We strongly stand by the position taken, and reiterate that it is the duty of industry to provide consumers with clear information supported by scientific data so that marketing claims do in fact match product results.”
The Bioplastics Council is comprised of eight member companies: Arkema, BASF Corp., Cereplast Inc., DuPont Co., NatureWorks LLC, PolyOne Corp., Teknor Apex and Telles, the joint venture company of Metabolix and Archer Daniels Midland. Seven of those eight — with the exception of Teknor Apex — also are members of European Bioplastics, a trade group formed in 2006.
Two other recycling-focused trade groups – the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) and the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) also have raised concerns about oxo-biodegradable additives. APR in particular has challenged additives producers to produce evidence that their products won’t ultimately weaken products made from recycled resins.
Steve Alexander, executive director of APR, said degradable additives have at least two environmental hurdles to overcome.
“First, do the additives in fact lead to degradation of plastic molecules to carbon dioxide and water? Doubts and claims abound, particularly about timeframes. While such discussions are interesting and necessary, we as citizens wonder if degradation leads to environmental benefit on its own or is degradation an environmental negative and initiation of new environmental issues. We believe the greater environmental benefit and sustainable action is to use the plastic molecule again and not waste it,” Alexander said in a statement.
“Second, and more pertinent to our interests in plastics recycling, we wonder how the additives affect the process of recycling, the making of the next item from recycled plastic, and the service life of the next item, Alexander said. “Premature demise of items made of recycled plastic which contain degradable additives is not helpful. The early failure of some items impacts the reputation of all.”
Alexander said APR is pleased that some companies, such as Symphony, have excluded PET as a targeted resin, and that some are proceeding to test their materials per the APR degradable additives protocol.
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
Government of India, press office
Ministry of environment and forests
Status of Implementation of Plastic Wastes Management in States / Union Territories
Delhi , February 1,2010
Various States have increased the minimum thickness of plastic carry bags to even higher limits of 40, 50, or 70 microns. These States/ UTs are: Goa (40 micron), Himachal Pradesh ( 70 micron; HP Cabinet decided to ban plastics in the entire State with effect from 15.08.2009), Maharashtra (50 micron), Meghalaya ( 40 micron), Punjab (30 micron), Chandigarh (30 micron), West Bengal (40 micron ), Kerala (30 micron)
(a) The Government of Delhi issued a notification dated 21st November 2008 titled “ the Delhi Degradable Plastic Bag ( Manufacturing, Sale and Usage )and Garbage (Control) (Amendment ) Act, 2008” Section 11(b0 of this notification stipulates that no person shall manufacture, stock, distribute or sell plastic begs made of virgin of recycled, degradable or non –degradable plastic bags which are less than 40 microns in thickness. Another notification issued on 7th January 2009 under the powers delegated to Government of Delhi by the Central Government under Section -5 of the Environment (Protection ) Act, 1986, which prohibits the use, sale and storage off all kinds of plastic bags in Five Star and Four Star Hotels, Hospitals with 100 more beds except the use of plastic bags as pres cribbed under Bio-medical Waste (management and handling) Rules, seats, all fruits and vegetable outlets selling different consumer products including fruits and vegetables.
(b) West Bengal Pollution Control Board has banned manufacture, sale and use of plastic carry bags in ecologically fragile areas viz the entire Sunderban areas, Hilly areas of Darjeeling distinct, Sub-division, CRZ areas (Digha, Sagar, Bakkhali etc.), Forest areas and in different heritage and tourist site.
(c) Action has been initiated for public awareness (trainings, workshops) for plastic waste management such as proper disposal of plastic bottles, banning of plastic carry bags, use of cloth/jute bags etc.
(d) Coloured Plastic carry bags have been banned in Himachal Pradesh. Use of plastic carry begs have been banned in some districts in Mizoram /West Bengal
(e) Jammu and Kashmir has also banned polythene carry bags under Non Bio- Degradable Material (Management, Handling and Disposal) Act, 2007 with effect from 11.5.2009.(f) Government of Himachal Pradesh has taken a cabinet decision for complete bad of plastics in Himachal Pradesh under the HP Non-Biodegradable Garbage Control Act, 1995 effective from 15th August 2009.
KP
Status of Implementation of Plastic Wastes Management in States / Union Territories
Delhi , February 1,2010
Various States have increased the minimum thickness of plastic carry bags to even higher limits of 40, 50, or 70 microns. These States/ UTs are: Goa (40 micron), Himachal Pradesh ( 70 micron; HP Cabinet decided to ban plastics in the entire State with effect from 15.08.2009), Maharashtra (50 micron), Meghalaya ( 40 micron), Punjab (30 micron), Chandigarh (30 micron), West Bengal (40 micron ), Kerala (30 micron)
(a) The Government of Delhi issued a notification dated 21st November 2008 titled “ the Delhi Degradable Plastic Bag ( Manufacturing, Sale and Usage )and Garbage (Control) (Amendment ) Act, 2008” Section 11(b0 of this notification stipulates that no person shall manufacture, stock, distribute or sell plastic begs made of virgin of recycled, degradable or non –degradable plastic bags which are less than 40 microns in thickness. Another notification issued on 7th January 2009 under the powers delegated to Government of Delhi by the Central Government under Section -5 of the Environment (Protection ) Act, 1986, which prohibits the use, sale and storage off all kinds of plastic bags in Five Star and Four Star Hotels, Hospitals with 100 more beds except the use of plastic bags as pres cribbed under Bio-medical Waste (management and handling) Rules, seats, all fruits and vegetable outlets selling different consumer products including fruits and vegetables.
(b) West Bengal Pollution Control Board has banned manufacture, sale and use of plastic carry bags in ecologically fragile areas viz the entire Sunderban areas, Hilly areas of Darjeeling distinct, Sub-division, CRZ areas (Digha, Sagar, Bakkhali etc.), Forest areas and in different heritage and tourist site.
(c) Action has been initiated for public awareness (trainings, workshops) for plastic waste management such as proper disposal of plastic bottles, banning of plastic carry bags, use of cloth/jute bags etc.
(d) Coloured Plastic carry bags have been banned in Himachal Pradesh. Use of plastic carry begs have been banned in some districts in Mizoram /West Bengal
(e) Jammu and Kashmir has also banned polythene carry bags under Non Bio- Degradable Material (Management, Handling and Disposal) Act, 2007 with effect from 11.5.2009.(f) Government of Himachal Pradesh has taken a cabinet decision for complete bad of plastics in Himachal Pradesh under the HP Non-Biodegradable Garbage Control Act, 1995 effective from 15th August 2009.
KP
Sunday, 31 January 2010
Daily Times India
Himachal promoting use of plastic waste to build roads
Shimla, Jan 31
Buoyed by the successful use of plastic waste to build three stretches of road, the Himachal Pradesh government will now use all the plastic waste it collected during a drive last month for road surfacing.
During the weeklong ‘Polythene Hatao, Paryavaran Bachao (remove polythene, save environment)’ campaign carried out across the state, about 1,381 quintals of waste was collected, a government spokesperson said.
“The entire plastic waste (1,381 quintals) would be used for laying plastic-bitumen mix roads in the state. This waste would be sufficient to tar a stretch of 138 km,” said the spokesperson.
The Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board in collaboration with the Public Works Department (PWD) has built three road stretches on a pilot basis by using shredded plastic waste on the outskirts of Shimla.
The waste plastic such as carry bags, disposable cups, laminated plastics like pouches of chips, pan masala, aluminium foil and packaging material used for biscuits, chocolates, milk and grocery items was used in surfacing roads.
“The results have been good in the past four months as there has been no stripping or any other major damage to the roads laid by using plastic-asphalt mix. Of course, the plastic blend not only helps lowering the cost of tarring but also enhances the durability of roads because of higher binding strength of plastic,” PWD superintending engineer Naresh Sharma told IANS.
Explaining the rationale for using the waste plastic in road construction, he said if plastic waste could be mixed up to 15 percent, this would lead to saving of equivalent quantity of asphalt, reducing the overall construction cost.
“The plastic waste replaces 10 to 15 percent of the bitumen and thus saves approximately Rs.35,000 to Rs.45,000 per km of a road stretch,” Sharma added.
Himachal Pradesh imposed on Oct 2, 2009, a ban on the production, storage, use, sale and distribution of all types of polythene bags made of non-biodegradable materials.
The government is also planning to include all plastic materials like disposable plates, cups and glasses in the ambit of the ban.
The ban on use of coloured polythene bags manufactured from recycled plastic was initially imposed Jan 1, 1999. Later in 2004, the ban was imposed under Section 7(h) of the State Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Rules on the use of small polythene bags having thickness less than 70 microns and size less than 18″x12″.
But last year a total ban was imposed on the use of polythene bags of all types and sizes.
Before the partial implementation of the ban in 2004, polythene pollution was a major problem in the state. During the monsoon, the rainwater brought along heaps of polythene bags and other non-biodegradable material that choked most drains.
Shimla, Jan 31
Buoyed by the successful use of plastic waste to build three stretches of road, the Himachal Pradesh government will now use all the plastic waste it collected during a drive last month for road surfacing.
During the weeklong ‘Polythene Hatao, Paryavaran Bachao (remove polythene, save environment)’ campaign carried out across the state, about 1,381 quintals of waste was collected, a government spokesperson said.
“The entire plastic waste (1,381 quintals) would be used for laying plastic-bitumen mix roads in the state. This waste would be sufficient to tar a stretch of 138 km,” said the spokesperson.
The Himachal Pradesh State Pollution Control Board in collaboration with the Public Works Department (PWD) has built three road stretches on a pilot basis by using shredded plastic waste on the outskirts of Shimla.
The waste plastic such as carry bags, disposable cups, laminated plastics like pouches of chips, pan masala, aluminium foil and packaging material used for biscuits, chocolates, milk and grocery items was used in surfacing roads.
“The results have been good in the past four months as there has been no stripping or any other major damage to the roads laid by using plastic-asphalt mix. Of course, the plastic blend not only helps lowering the cost of tarring but also enhances the durability of roads because of higher binding strength of plastic,” PWD superintending engineer Naresh Sharma told IANS.
Explaining the rationale for using the waste plastic in road construction, he said if plastic waste could be mixed up to 15 percent, this would lead to saving of equivalent quantity of asphalt, reducing the overall construction cost.
“The plastic waste replaces 10 to 15 percent of the bitumen and thus saves approximately Rs.35,000 to Rs.45,000 per km of a road stretch,” Sharma added.
Himachal Pradesh imposed on Oct 2, 2009, a ban on the production, storage, use, sale and distribution of all types of polythene bags made of non-biodegradable materials.
The government is also planning to include all plastic materials like disposable plates, cups and glasses in the ambit of the ban.
The ban on use of coloured polythene bags manufactured from recycled plastic was initially imposed Jan 1, 1999. Later in 2004, the ban was imposed under Section 7(h) of the State Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Rules on the use of small polythene bags having thickness less than 70 microns and size less than 18″x12″.
But last year a total ban was imposed on the use of polythene bags of all types and sizes.
Before the partial implementation of the ban in 2004, polythene pollution was a major problem in the state. During the monsoon, the rainwater brought along heaps of polythene bags and other non-biodegradable material that choked most drains.
Saturday, 30 January 2010
Plastic fantastic?
Mumbai: BMC may cancel licence if plastic diktat is flouted
January 30, 2010
MUMBAI: The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) proposes to cancel the licences of those commercial establishments found selling plastic carry bags below 50 microns.
The harsh punishment is being recommended as part of a string of measures the civic body will forward to the state government, to curb the menace of plastic bags.
The new BMC proposal will be tabled before the civic house next week. Once cleared, the civic body will ask the state to make necessary changes to the Maharashtra Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Ordinance, 2006.
“The licences of errant establishment — dealers and retailers — will be cancelled if they are found to be selling plastic bags below the prescribed limit,’’ said a senior civic official of the BMC shops and establishment.The municipal corporation has 4.78 lakh shops, commercial establishment, hotels, restaurants and eating houses, registered under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. The other measures recommended in the new proposal include one that errant manufacturers must be prosecuted. Litigation will act as a deterrent against those who produce unauthorised bags, officials said.
Currently, first-time offenders are fined Rs 5,000 and second-time offenders, Rs 10,000. Third-time offenders are fined Rs 25,000 and can be sentenced to a three-month jail term.
The BMC has also suggested suitable changes in the existing laws to make consumers responsible for aiding and abetting circulation of banned plastic bag.
A fine ranging from Rs 5 to Rs 100 would be imposed on anyone found carrying plastic bags of a thickness less than 50 microns. The thickness limit of 50 micron could also be altered to that of 70, officials said. The idea is to make the existing rules more stringent to discourage manufacturing, use and circulation of banned plastic, since it is difficult to take action against manufacturing units, most of which are located outside city limits. Within the city, it is the responsibility of Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) to take action, an offical said. “We can only take action against them at our Octroi check nakas. However, even that is difficult since unauthorised plastic is mostly smuggled under the garb of miscellaneous goods,’’ said additional municipal commissioner R A Rajeev.
January 30, 2010
MUMBAI: The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) proposes to cancel the licences of those commercial establishments found selling plastic carry bags below 50 microns.
The harsh punishment is being recommended as part of a string of measures the civic body will forward to the state government, to curb the menace of plastic bags.
The new BMC proposal will be tabled before the civic house next week. Once cleared, the civic body will ask the state to make necessary changes to the Maharashtra Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Ordinance, 2006.
“The licences of errant establishment — dealers and retailers — will be cancelled if they are found to be selling plastic bags below the prescribed limit,’’ said a senior civic official of the BMC shops and establishment.The municipal corporation has 4.78 lakh shops, commercial establishment, hotels, restaurants and eating houses, registered under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. The other measures recommended in the new proposal include one that errant manufacturers must be prosecuted. Litigation will act as a deterrent against those who produce unauthorised bags, officials said.
Currently, first-time offenders are fined Rs 5,000 and second-time offenders, Rs 10,000. Third-time offenders are fined Rs 25,000 and can be sentenced to a three-month jail term.
The BMC has also suggested suitable changes in the existing laws to make consumers responsible for aiding and abetting circulation of banned plastic bag.
A fine ranging from Rs 5 to Rs 100 would be imposed on anyone found carrying plastic bags of a thickness less than 50 microns. The thickness limit of 50 micron could also be altered to that of 70, officials said. The idea is to make the existing rules more stringent to discourage manufacturing, use and circulation of banned plastic, since it is difficult to take action against manufacturing units, most of which are located outside city limits. Within the city, it is the responsibility of Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) to take action, an offical said. “We can only take action against them at our Octroi check nakas. However, even that is difficult since unauthorised plastic is mostly smuggled under the garb of miscellaneous goods,’’ said additional municipal commissioner R A Rajeev.
Friday, 29 January 2010
Today's press
New Kerala.com
SC not to lift ban on use of plastic bags
New Delhi, Jan 29 :
The Supreme Court today refused to lift the ban on the use on plastic and polythene bags.
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan today declined the plea of the All India Plastic Manufacturers Association for staying the operation of Delhi High Court judgement which had banned the use of polythene bags in the national capital.
Earlier, counsel for the petitioner submitted before the court that the use of polythene bags do not cause environmental pollution. Also the livelihood of the people working in the plastic industry was at stake.
The apex court was, however, not impressed by the contention of the petitioner.
---------------------
India Environment Portal
Now, 70-micron plastic bags may come under ban
Sandeep Ashar / DNA
Friday, January 29
Mumbai: The ban on polythene bags may get extended beyond 50 microns. The civic administration, which was recently asked by the government to formulate a draft suggesting revisions to the existing ban, is likely to recommend the inclusion of plastic bags made up of polythene thicker than 50 microns in the ban’s ambit.
Unconfirmed reports suggested that to increase the efficacy of the ban, carrybags below 70 microns could well be brought under the scanner.
The anti-plastic carrybag drive begun with a ban on the use of plastic below 20 microns in 2005. A year later, the ban was extended to below 50-micron plastic. A senior civic official said that any ban has to be progressive in nature. The draft recommendations prepared by the civic body will be tabled before the corporation next week.
The draft will also suggest recommendations of including thin bags (not classified as carrybags) in the ban’s ambit. Current provisions in the Maharashtra Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Ordinance, 2006, exclude thin plastic.
The civic administration is likely to press for a restriction on the use of materials like cups and plates made of thin plastic.
Dr Mahindra Parmar, president, All India Plastic Manufacturers’ Association, said that his organisation will not have an objection to an extension of the ban to 70 micron. “We feel that this will only increase the tendency of the people to re-use permitted plastic. This will lead to a reduction in discarded plastic,” he said.
Dr Parmar also said that quality polythene bags are made of above 100-micron plastic. He, however, added that ban on plastic of any thickness will not work till proper arrangements are made for its efficient disposal. The association has proposed to work with the BMC to set up recycling centres.
SC not to lift ban on use of plastic bags
New Delhi, Jan 29 :
The Supreme Court today refused to lift the ban on the use on plastic and polythene bags.
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan today declined the plea of the All India Plastic Manufacturers Association for staying the operation of Delhi High Court judgement which had banned the use of polythene bags in the national capital.
Earlier, counsel for the petitioner submitted before the court that the use of polythene bags do not cause environmental pollution. Also the livelihood of the people working in the plastic industry was at stake.
The apex court was, however, not impressed by the contention of the petitioner.
---------------------
India Environment Portal
Now, 70-micron plastic bags may come under ban
Sandeep Ashar / DNA
Friday, January 29
Mumbai: The ban on polythene bags may get extended beyond 50 microns. The civic administration, which was recently asked by the government to formulate a draft suggesting revisions to the existing ban, is likely to recommend the inclusion of plastic bags made up of polythene thicker than 50 microns in the ban’s ambit.
Unconfirmed reports suggested that to increase the efficacy of the ban, carrybags below 70 microns could well be brought under the scanner.
The anti-plastic carrybag drive begun with a ban on the use of plastic below 20 microns in 2005. A year later, the ban was extended to below 50-micron plastic. A senior civic official said that any ban has to be progressive in nature. The draft recommendations prepared by the civic body will be tabled before the corporation next week.
The draft will also suggest recommendations of including thin bags (not classified as carrybags) in the ban’s ambit. Current provisions in the Maharashtra Non-Biodegradable Garbage (Control) Ordinance, 2006, exclude thin plastic.
The civic administration is likely to press for a restriction on the use of materials like cups and plates made of thin plastic.
Dr Mahindra Parmar, president, All India Plastic Manufacturers’ Association, said that his organisation will not have an objection to an extension of the ban to 70 micron. “We feel that this will only increase the tendency of the people to re-use permitted plastic. This will lead to a reduction in discarded plastic,” he said.
Dr Parmar also said that quality polythene bags are made of above 100-micron plastic. He, however, added that ban on plastic of any thickness will not work till proper arrangements are made for its efficient disposal. The association has proposed to work with the BMC to set up recycling centres.
Thursday, 28 January 2010
From the press
OneIndia
Plastic garbage turns off for tourists in Himachal Pradesh
Kufri, Jan 28
The plastic garbage scattered in the Kufri region of Himachal Pradesh has been disappointing the tourists visiting the region.
Although Himachal Pradesh became the first state in India to impose a ban on the use of plastic bags on June 5, 2004, many shopkeepers across the state continue to use plastic bags in gross violation of the law.
The plastic waste scattered in and around the Mahasu Peak, one of the main attractions of the Kufri region.Located at an altitude of 10,000-feet above sea level, the Mahasu Peak is the highest in Kufri, and experiences heavy snowfall between the months of December and February.
"My impression before coming to this place was that it is a very beautiful place and we were expecting a lot of snowfall here, but when we came here, the impression was too bad. There is no proper disposable garbage. There is garbage all around. The municipal committee of this place should install more and more hoardings, and should make people aware that this place is of natural beauty, and we should not only enjoy ourselves but we have to sustain this for our future generations," said Ashish Gupta, a tourist from Delhi.
he state's tourism department admits the problem of pollution and worsening conditions of the hill destination.Director of the Tourism Department, Arun Sharma, said that meetings with locals and departments of the state government are being organized to resolve this issue."
The Tourism Department is ready to help them in this regard. I have already spoken to the Environment Department and District Administration, and we are going to discuss this issue with the Panchayat representatives in detail, to take necessary steps for curbing this problem. If then also we don't come across any solution, then simultaneously we will invoke penal provisions," said Sharma.
The Hindu
Plastic waste to be collected from six wards of Nagercoil Municipality
Staff Reporter
Nagercoil:
The district administration has selected six wards of Nagercoil Municipality for the implementation of collecting and sending non-degradable plastic waste from Kanyakumari district to India Cements in Tirunelveli district as fuel, said the Collector, Rajendra Ratnoo.
India Cements
The Collector said that the non-degradable waste from three wards would be collected once in a week, on Monday, and the same would be sent to India Cements everyday from the other three wards.
This was a pilot project and if successfully implemented, it would be extended to other parts of the district, with an intention to announce Kanyakumari as a ‘plastic-free district’ on or before April 1.
More than 400 college and school students underwent special training programme, organised by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to take this message to the people from all walks of life.
They would visit nook and corner of each and every village to create awareness among the people on the need for not using plastic items. They would instead tell them to use eco-friendly paper bags and cups.
All the local bodies had been asked to pass a resolution in the council meeting about the ban on the usage of plastic materials.
Throwing the plastic materials would obstruct the rise in groundwater level during rainy season.
Paper bags
The Project Officer of District Rural Development Agency, Santhos Kumar, was asked to select self help groups capable of making paper bags and cups on or before March 15.
As fuel
The Executive Engineer of Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Kirubanatha Rajan, said that the district administration of Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli and Tuticorin districts made an agreement with India Cements to provide non-degradable wastes to be used as fuel for manufacturing cement.
Plastic garbage turns off for tourists in Himachal Pradesh
Kufri, Jan 28
The plastic garbage scattered in the Kufri region of Himachal Pradesh has been disappointing the tourists visiting the region.
Although Himachal Pradesh became the first state in India to impose a ban on the use of plastic bags on June 5, 2004, many shopkeepers across the state continue to use plastic bags in gross violation of the law.
The plastic waste scattered in and around the Mahasu Peak, one of the main attractions of the Kufri region.Located at an altitude of 10,000-feet above sea level, the Mahasu Peak is the highest in Kufri, and experiences heavy snowfall between the months of December and February.
"My impression before coming to this place was that it is a very beautiful place and we were expecting a lot of snowfall here, but when we came here, the impression was too bad. There is no proper disposable garbage. There is garbage all around. The municipal committee of this place should install more and more hoardings, and should make people aware that this place is of natural beauty, and we should not only enjoy ourselves but we have to sustain this for our future generations," said Ashish Gupta, a tourist from Delhi.
he state's tourism department admits the problem of pollution and worsening conditions of the hill destination.Director of the Tourism Department, Arun Sharma, said that meetings with locals and departments of the state government are being organized to resolve this issue."
The Tourism Department is ready to help them in this regard. I have already spoken to the Environment Department and District Administration, and we are going to discuss this issue with the Panchayat representatives in detail, to take necessary steps for curbing this problem. If then also we don't come across any solution, then simultaneously we will invoke penal provisions," said Sharma.
The Hindu
Plastic waste to be collected from six wards of Nagercoil Municipality
Staff Reporter
Nagercoil:
The district administration has selected six wards of Nagercoil Municipality for the implementation of collecting and sending non-degradable plastic waste from Kanyakumari district to India Cements in Tirunelveli district as fuel, said the Collector, Rajendra Ratnoo.
India Cements
The Collector said that the non-degradable waste from three wards would be collected once in a week, on Monday, and the same would be sent to India Cements everyday from the other three wards.
This was a pilot project and if successfully implemented, it would be extended to other parts of the district, with an intention to announce Kanyakumari as a ‘plastic-free district’ on or before April 1.
More than 400 college and school students underwent special training programme, organised by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to take this message to the people from all walks of life.
They would visit nook and corner of each and every village to create awareness among the people on the need for not using plastic items. They would instead tell them to use eco-friendly paper bags and cups.
All the local bodies had been asked to pass a resolution in the council meeting about the ban on the usage of plastic materials.
Throwing the plastic materials would obstruct the rise in groundwater level during rainy season.
Paper bags
The Project Officer of District Rural Development Agency, Santhos Kumar, was asked to select self help groups capable of making paper bags and cups on or before March 15.
As fuel
The Executive Engineer of Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Kirubanatha Rajan, said that the district administration of Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli and Tuticorin districts made an agreement with India Cements to provide non-degradable wastes to be used as fuel for manufacturing cement.
B.Y.O???
Bring Your Own Bag:
102 Cities and Countries That Ban or Tax Plastic Bags
The "paper or plastic" mantra once commonly heard at check-out stands around the world is rapidly being replaced with, "Did you BYOB, "Bring Your Own Bag."As with so many other trends in the U.S., San Francisco started the bag-ban movement, effective April 2007 and translating into 5 million fewer plastic bags being used every month. Bangladesh outlawed the petroleum-based products in 2002, with cities and countries from China to Zanzibar soon following suit.
Our nation's capitol [US] set an example for the rest of the country this month when they began levying a 5-cents surcharge on plastic and paper bags at stores that sell food and/or alcohol. U.S. legislators took note and introduced the Plastic Bag Reduction Act, imposing a five-cent fee on “single-use” bags in larger stores.Last June -- despite intense push-back from plastic-bag manufacturers -- the United Nations jumped into the fray and called for a global ban on single-use plastic bags, the second most common form of litter after cigarette butts.The movement is seen as a way to protect the environment, curb global warming and reform a disposable-minded society.
The ubiquitous bags are blamed for choking birds and fish, floating into trees, rooftops and streets and sticking around years longer than paper. About 100,000 whales, seals, turtles and other marine animals are killed by plastic bags each year worldwide, according to Planet Ark, an international environmental group. The Chinese call them "white pollution" and they're known derisively in South Africa as the "national flower."
As a result of all this hue and cry, the BYOB (Bring Your Own Bag) movement is growing by leaps and bounds. RUBs, or re-usable bags, made from cloth or recycled materials have turned into a major industry. Many stores now take 5-cents off each RUB they pack.
Plastic Bag Fees
Belgium – Effective July 1, 2007
Denmark – Adopted in 1994
Germany - Adopted in 2003
Hong Kong – Adopted April 2009; Effective July 2009
Irish Republic – Effective March 2002, 15-cents per bag
Israel – Adopted June 2008
Italy – Adopted in 1988; Ban to be introduced in 2010
Netherlands – Effective January 2008
Seattle, Washington – Adopted by city council on July 28, 2008 – Defeated by ballot initiative on August 18th
Toronto, Ontario —Effective June 1, 2009
Washington, D.C. – Adopted June 16, 2009
Plastic Bag Bans United States--
Alaska – As of 1998, 30 villages and towns have bans--
District of Columbia - Effective January 2010--
Edmonds, WA – Adopted August 2009; Effective August 2010--
Fairfax, Calif. – Passed by voter initiative on November 4, 2008--
Kauai County, Hawaii- Effective 2011--
Malibu, Calif. – Adopted May 2008--Manhattan Beach, Calif. – Adopted July 1, 2008 – In lawsuit--Marshall County, Iowa – Effective April 9, 2009--
Maui County, Hawaii - Effective 2011--
North Carolina (Outer Banks) – Adopted June 24, 2009; Effective September 1, 2009--
Oakland, Calif. – Adopted June 29, 2007 – Voluntary ban--Paia,
Maui, Hawaii – Effective 2008--
Palo Alto, Calif. - Adopted March 2009; Effective September 2009--
San Francisco, Calif. – Adopted April 2007--
Suffolk County, New York – Adopted in 1988--
Westport, Connecticut – Adopted September 2, 2008; Effective March 19, 2009
Bangladesh - Effective March 1, 2002--
Dahka - Banned plastic bags in January of 2002--
Bhutan - Adopted June 2006
Botswana - Effective February 1, 2007
Brazil – Effective October 2007
Buenos Aires, Argentina – Effective September 2008
China - Effective June 1, 2008
Coles Bay, Tasmania - Effective April 2003
Egypt (Red Sea Province) – Effective January 1, 2009
Eritrea – Adopted in 2005
France – Phase out completely by 2010--
Corsica – Full ban effective 1999--
Paris – Full ban adopted January 2007
India - In 2002, the Indian government mandated a thickness rule on plastic bags. All bags must be greater than 20 microns in thickness--
Delhi, India – Full ban effective January 2009--
Chandigarh, India – Full ban effective October 2, 2008--
Himachal Pradesh, India - Full ban effective 2003--
Maharashtra, India - Full ban effective August 2005Italy – Effective 2010. Previously, the country had a plastic bag tax
Karachi, Pakistan - Effective December 2008
Kenya – Adopted in June 2007
Loddon Shire, Victoria (Australia) - Effective December 2005
Macedonia – Effective January 1, 2009
Manitoba, Canada--Coldwell – Adopted August 12, 2008; Effective October 2008--
Eriksdale – December 9, 2008--
Leaf Rapids - Effective April 2007
Mexico City, Mexico – Adopted March 2009; Effective August 2009
New South Wales (Australia)--Huskisson – Adopted November 2003--
Kangaroo Valley – Adopted November 2003--Mogo – Adopted September 2003
Nova Scotia, Canada – Effective fall 2008 (applies to liquor stores only)
Papua New Guinea - Effective December 2004
Quebec, Canada – Effective 2009 (provincial ban applies to liquor stores only)--
Huntingdon – Full ban effective January 2008--
Amqui – Full ban effective Spring 2008Rwanda - Adopted in 2005
Somalia - Adopted in 2005
Somaliland – Effective March 2005
South Africa - Adopted May 9, 2003
South Australia – Adopted November 2008; Effective May 2009
Spain – Mandatory phase out of 50-percent by end of 2009
Taiwan – Adopted in 2007
Tanzania – Effective October 2006--
Zanzibar – Ban in 2007
Uganda - Effective July 1, 2007
Ulanbaatar, Mongolia – Adopted June 2008
United Kingdom
--Aylsham, England – Effective May 3, 2008--
Banchory, Scotland – Effective January 2008--
Girton, England – Effective January 2008--
Hay-On-Wye, Wales – Effective December 2007--
Hebden Bridge, England – Effective December 2007--
Henfield, England – Effective May 2008--
Kew, England – Effective July 2008--
Llandysilio, Wales – Effective 2007--
Modbury, England – Effective May 1, 2007--
Overton, England – Effective October 2007--
Selkirk, Scotland – Effective April 4, 2008--Tisbury, England – Effective January 2008
102 Cities and Countries That Ban or Tax Plastic Bags
The "paper or plastic" mantra once commonly heard at check-out stands around the world is rapidly being replaced with, "Did you BYOB, "Bring Your Own Bag."As with so many other trends in the U.S., San Francisco started the bag-ban movement, effective April 2007 and translating into 5 million fewer plastic bags being used every month. Bangladesh outlawed the petroleum-based products in 2002, with cities and countries from China to Zanzibar soon following suit.
Our nation's capitol [US] set an example for the rest of the country this month when they began levying a 5-cents surcharge on plastic and paper bags at stores that sell food and/or alcohol. U.S. legislators took note and introduced the Plastic Bag Reduction Act, imposing a five-cent fee on “single-use” bags in larger stores.Last June -- despite intense push-back from plastic-bag manufacturers -- the United Nations jumped into the fray and called for a global ban on single-use plastic bags, the second most common form of litter after cigarette butts.The movement is seen as a way to protect the environment, curb global warming and reform a disposable-minded society.
The ubiquitous bags are blamed for choking birds and fish, floating into trees, rooftops and streets and sticking around years longer than paper. About 100,000 whales, seals, turtles and other marine animals are killed by plastic bags each year worldwide, according to Planet Ark, an international environmental group. The Chinese call them "white pollution" and they're known derisively in South Africa as the "national flower."
As a result of all this hue and cry, the BYOB (Bring Your Own Bag) movement is growing by leaps and bounds. RUBs, or re-usable bags, made from cloth or recycled materials have turned into a major industry. Many stores now take 5-cents off each RUB they pack.
Plastic Bag Fees
Belgium – Effective July 1, 2007
Denmark – Adopted in 1994
Germany - Adopted in 2003
Hong Kong – Adopted April 2009; Effective July 2009
Irish Republic – Effective March 2002, 15-cents per bag
Israel – Adopted June 2008
Italy – Adopted in 1988; Ban to be introduced in 2010
Netherlands – Effective January 2008
Seattle, Washington – Adopted by city council on July 28, 2008 – Defeated by ballot initiative on August 18th
Toronto, Ontario —Effective June 1, 2009
Washington, D.C. – Adopted June 16, 2009
Plastic Bag Bans United States--
Alaska – As of 1998, 30 villages and towns have bans--
District of Columbia - Effective January 2010--
Edmonds, WA – Adopted August 2009; Effective August 2010--
Fairfax, Calif. – Passed by voter initiative on November 4, 2008--
Kauai County, Hawaii- Effective 2011--
Malibu, Calif. – Adopted May 2008--Manhattan Beach, Calif. – Adopted July 1, 2008 – In lawsuit--Marshall County, Iowa – Effective April 9, 2009--
Maui County, Hawaii - Effective 2011--
North Carolina (Outer Banks) – Adopted June 24, 2009; Effective September 1, 2009--
Oakland, Calif. – Adopted June 29, 2007 – Voluntary ban--Paia,
Maui, Hawaii – Effective 2008--
Palo Alto, Calif. - Adopted March 2009; Effective September 2009--
San Francisco, Calif. – Adopted April 2007--
Suffolk County, New York – Adopted in 1988--
Westport, Connecticut – Adopted September 2, 2008; Effective March 19, 2009
Bangladesh - Effective March 1, 2002--
Dahka - Banned plastic bags in January of 2002--
Bhutan - Adopted June 2006
Botswana - Effective February 1, 2007
Brazil – Effective October 2007
Buenos Aires, Argentina – Effective September 2008
China - Effective June 1, 2008
Coles Bay, Tasmania - Effective April 2003
Egypt (Red Sea Province) – Effective January 1, 2009
Eritrea – Adopted in 2005
France – Phase out completely by 2010--
Corsica – Full ban effective 1999--
Paris – Full ban adopted January 2007
India - In 2002, the Indian government mandated a thickness rule on plastic bags. All bags must be greater than 20 microns in thickness--
Delhi, India – Full ban effective January 2009--
Chandigarh, India – Full ban effective October 2, 2008--
Himachal Pradesh, India - Full ban effective 2003--
Maharashtra, India - Full ban effective August 2005Italy – Effective 2010. Previously, the country had a plastic bag tax
Karachi, Pakistan - Effective December 2008
Kenya – Adopted in June 2007
Loddon Shire, Victoria (Australia) - Effective December 2005
Macedonia – Effective January 1, 2009
Manitoba, Canada--Coldwell – Adopted August 12, 2008; Effective October 2008--
Eriksdale – December 9, 2008--
Leaf Rapids - Effective April 2007
Mexico City, Mexico – Adopted March 2009; Effective August 2009
New South Wales (Australia)--Huskisson – Adopted November 2003--
Kangaroo Valley – Adopted November 2003--Mogo – Adopted September 2003
Nova Scotia, Canada – Effective fall 2008 (applies to liquor stores only)
Papua New Guinea - Effective December 2004
Quebec, Canada – Effective 2009 (provincial ban applies to liquor stores only)--
Huntingdon – Full ban effective January 2008--
Amqui – Full ban effective Spring 2008Rwanda - Adopted in 2005
Somalia - Adopted in 2005
Somaliland – Effective March 2005
South Africa - Adopted May 9, 2003
South Australia – Adopted November 2008; Effective May 2009
Spain – Mandatory phase out of 50-percent by end of 2009
Taiwan – Adopted in 2007
Tanzania – Effective October 2006--
Zanzibar – Ban in 2007
Uganda - Effective July 1, 2007
Ulanbaatar, Mongolia – Adopted June 2008
United Kingdom
--Aylsham, England – Effective May 3, 2008--
Banchory, Scotland – Effective January 2008--
Girton, England – Effective January 2008--
Hay-On-Wye, Wales – Effective December 2007--
Hebden Bridge, England – Effective December 2007--
Henfield, England – Effective May 2008--
Kew, England – Effective July 2008--
Llandysilio, Wales – Effective 2007--
Modbury, England – Effective May 1, 2007--
Overton, England – Effective October 2007--
Selkirk, Scotland – Effective April 4, 2008--Tisbury, England – Effective January 2008
Saturday, 23 January 2010
Plastic makers move BMC with recycle mantra
Sandeep Ashar / DNA
Even as the city’s political leadership debates on whether or not to impose a blanket ban on plastic bags, the plastic manufacturers have come forward with a solution to reduce the menace of the toxic trash.
The All India Plastic Manufacturers Association, a representative body for over 600 plastic manufacturers of Mumbai and 2,000 across the country, has proposed to recycle and nullify the adverse impacts of discarded plastic waste.
Recycling of banned plastic bags (below 50-micron) is also included in the proposal, which has been forwarded to the BMC.
The association representatives who met mayor Shraddha Jadhav recently, have offered to set up recycling centres to treat discarded plastic bags. Although the association is ready to incur all the costs, it wants the BMC to allocate space to get access to the plastic waste generated in the city. It has suggested that some of these centres could be set up in a small portion of the dumping grounds. “This will also facilitate access to segregated waste,” said one member.
The association claims to have access to technologies that can reprocess all forms of plastic into useful products like plastowood, a durable wood-like material.
To improve efficiency of plastic waste collection, the association has suggested that collection of plastic waste in separate bins be made mandatory for all licensed shop owners. It has proposed to set up collection centres where this could be sold. The centres will in turn transport this to the recycling centres. The BMC could also share some of the revenue earned by the sale of the recycled products, it said.
Opposing a complete ban on plastic bags, the association has supported vigorous implementation of the existing provisions. While insisting that alternatives to plastic should be found, Jadhav said that the proposal will be deliberated upon.
Even as the city’s political leadership debates on whether or not to impose a blanket ban on plastic bags, the plastic manufacturers have come forward with a solution to reduce the menace of the toxic trash.
The All India Plastic Manufacturers Association, a representative body for over 600 plastic manufacturers of Mumbai and 2,000 across the country, has proposed to recycle and nullify the adverse impacts of discarded plastic waste.
Recycling of banned plastic bags (below 50-micron) is also included in the proposal, which has been forwarded to the BMC.
The association representatives who met mayor Shraddha Jadhav recently, have offered to set up recycling centres to treat discarded plastic bags. Although the association is ready to incur all the costs, it wants the BMC to allocate space to get access to the plastic waste generated in the city. It has suggested that some of these centres could be set up in a small portion of the dumping grounds. “This will also facilitate access to segregated waste,” said one member.
The association claims to have access to technologies that can reprocess all forms of plastic into useful products like plastowood, a durable wood-like material.
To improve efficiency of plastic waste collection, the association has suggested that collection of plastic waste in separate bins be made mandatory for all licensed shop owners. It has proposed to set up collection centres where this could be sold. The centres will in turn transport this to the recycling centres. The BMC could also share some of the revenue earned by the sale of the recycled products, it said.
Opposing a complete ban on plastic bags, the association has supported vigorous implementation of the existing provisions. While insisting that alternatives to plastic should be found, Jadhav said that the proposal will be deliberated upon.
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
Daily Times India
Plastic industry supports jail for law-breaking units
Gandhinagar, Jan 5 (IANS) The plastic industry is willing to support any government initiative aimed at evolving a consensus on deterrent punishment for those who manufacture plastic carrybags of less than 20 microns in violation of existing laws.
“We will support a government initiative for a consensus on providing a jail term for such law violators,” Jigish Doshi, chairman of the “Plexpo India 2010″ – India’s largest exhibition for plastic and packaging industry commencing in Ahmedabad Jan 9 – told mediapersons here Tuesday.
Noting the present rules providing for penalty were proving ineffective in deterring those involved in making plastic carry-bags of less than 20 microns, he stressed the need for prison terms as a deterrent.
“We would like to assure the authorities that the associations of plastic manufacturers themselves would help the authorities to identify such errant manufacturers and put them behind the bar,” Doshi said, adding the plastic manufacturers were “equally concerned about the environment as anyone else”.
Doshi contested the claim that any non-biodegradable plastic material was a threat to the environment.
“The problem is only with the very thin carry-bags of less than 20 microns which constitute less than one per cent of the total plastic materials manufactured in the country. Plastic is recycled in great measure with new products being manufactured from the old ones, thus disposal problems are automatically eliminated,” he said.
Advocating replacement of cement and steel components with plastic in many products, he noted plastic manufacturing was comparatively less polluting, non-toxic and caused zero emission.
The 90,000 unit strong national plastic manufacturing industry processes over six million tonnes of polymer per annum while another about 7.5 million tonnes of plastic is re-cycled. “Future demand is projected to increase the processing of polymer to about 20 million tones,” he added.
The four-day exhibition is being organised in association with Plastindia Foundation and the Gujarat government. More than 400 exhibitors from 12 countries like China, Singapore, the UAE, Canada, the US, Italy, Switzerland and South Korea are slated to participate in the exhibition, which is held once every three years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
