(Low res - 320 x 240)
Sunday, 13 February 2011
Friday, 28 January 2011
The Hindu
New ways to tackle plastics menace
Staff Reporter
Staff Reporter
India's approach to plastic needs to change, says expert
New methods:
Michael Stephen, technical director of d2W, demonstrating a new gadget at the workshop in Bangalore on Friday. — Photo: K. Murali Kumar
Amidst plans to rework the monitoring mechanism for the implementation of the Plastic (Manufacture, Sale and Usage) rules 1999, the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) held a workshop to discuss various aspects of this legislation, and new technologies that can help reduce the impact of plastics.
Delivering the keynote address at the workshop, KSPCB Chairman A.S. Sadashivaiah said that a task force is being formed at the district-level to enforce this law that mandates the use of plastic with thickness more than 20 microns. However, he conceded that there are several “complications” even with this approach of tackling the plastic menace.
Mr. Sadashivaiah said: “We need to see what can be done to change our approach to plastics. Use of technology can make even thinner plastic degrade faster, so we need to look at a cost-effective and viable alternative to solving the plastic problem.” Out of the 3,500 tonnes of municipal solid waste generated in the city, plastic accounts for a substantial 110 tonnes, making its handling and management a critical issue.
‘Approach flawed'
Earlier, in a detailed presentation on various ways to tackle plastic, Michael Stephen, technical director of d2W, a company that deals with plastic technology, said that the decade-old rule that mandates a minimum thickness of 20 microns for plastic in India is “counter-intuitive to general discourse” on the same.
He pointed out that thinner plastic would require lesser fossil fuel and energy. “So it is strange that you should insist that what can be done at 10 or 15 micron must require more than 20 microns.”
Officials pointed out that the rationale behind this was to make it easier for ragpickers to segregate plastic, and to make recycling a more viable proposition. Mr. Stephen's presentation dealt with Oxo biodegradable plastics, a type of plastic to which small amounts of metal salt are added to catalyse or hasten the degradation process. He demonstrated the working of an X-Ray XRF Handgun, a gadget that helps determine the constituents of the plastic. OBDs have been used worldwide and we have not yet had any issues with toxicity or performance, he added.
Thursday, 8 July 2010
Instablog
Sreeja, Mumbai ,1 July
Blame it on the BMC’s half-hearted efforts, the shopkeepers or the customers, it is raining polythene bags in the city. Go to any local market in the sprawling city, the banned polythene bags are there for all to see.
The local government in Mumbai, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), has intensified its drive against the use of polythene bags due to the fear that the extensive use of the banned product may cause floods as was witnessed on July 26, 2005 in Mumbai. As the rainy season has set in, the BMC has woken up as experts are of the view that the July 2005 deluge was a result of the Mithi River, flowing through the heart of the city, overflowing because garbage had blocked the flow of water.
And to ensure the city’s drains do not choke on garbage and debris, the BMC has decided to impose a fine on people found dumping garbage in them. If anybody is caught throwing garbage in a drain, he or she will have to pay anything between Rs 100 and Rs 5,000 as a fine. For the first time, BMC teams formed in every ward under the ward officer will go around the city keeping an eye out for offenders. The amount of fine will depend on how much garbage an individual dumps. Clean up marshals will also be told to be alert.
There’s no laid-down formula to charge offenders. It depends on how much plastic they are found with. If there are 2-3 plastic bags, we charge Rs500; a big plastic bag is charged Rs100. If vegetable vendor has 6-7 packs with 600 plastic bags in each, the fine goes up.
But in spite of all the BMC’s efforts and the state government banning the product, it is everywhere in the city.There is a blame game going on in the city for the growing plastic bag menace. While the government blame the shopkeepers, they in turn blame the customers. “We are well aware of the law against plastic bags, but what do we do when customers ask us for bags. Why should we lose out on business? We are caught between the BMC’s fine and the customers’ demands,” vendors say.
Who is to be blamed for this extremely pathetic state of affairs on this grave issue?. It is sure, we all are responsible for it.But, primarily though the government had ritually banned the product to assuage the sad feelings of the people after the 2005 deluge, it never implemented the ban in letter and spirit.
The law is there, but implement it. That is the key.
Monday, 10 May 2010
Delhi’s ban on plastic bags gets a quiet burial
Hindustan Times
Avishek G Dastidar
New Delhi, May 10, 2010
Plastic bags are back with a vengeance. Shoppers across Delhi are once again going home with colourful plastic bags full of goodies that they’ve bought.
The shopkeepers have also started stocking them again in blatant violation of the plastic bag ban in place since January 2009. The Delhi government, meanwhile, seems to have turned a blind eye to it.
The latest records filed at the courts show that the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) could not spot more than 115 people using or selling plastic bags in the past 15 months in this city of nearly 2 crore people.
“Enforcing the ban in shops and unorganized sectors has been a problem,” admitted Dharmendra Kumar, Delhi Environment Secretary. “We have fined a number of people but we can’t have constant policing.”
With the government dragging its feet on the ban, one of Delhi’s biggest environmental policy interventions in years—after the introduction of Compressed Natural Gas-based public transport a decade ago—has died a slow death.
While the government claimed that the plastic bags had been weeded out of malls, a random check showed markets in Defence Colony, Janak Puri, INA market, Gole Market and Bengali Market were, as expected, teeming with violators.
Apart from grocery stores and sweet shops, meat shops and fruit vendors mushrooming across localities are bringing the bag back in circulation.
The Delhi government, too, goofed up in its reading of the laws governing the ban.
Sources said the DPCC had earlier asked the MCD to fine violators as per the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. But towards the middle of last year, the DPCC realised that the MCD could not fine anyone as the Environment Protection Act, 1986, which governs the ban, empowers only the state pollution boards for the job.
Thanks to this mix up, the MCD’s citywide reach could not be utilised to penalise violators.
“The government does not appear serious about the ban,” said Vinod Jain, the petitioner who had won the long-drawn case against the “plastic lobby” to force the ban on Delhi. Traders, who circulate the bags through their shops, said the government lost out to the well-organised network of the plastic bag manufacturers.
“Every morning, delivery boys come to the markets and deliver the plastic bags. For traders, it is a matter of availability of a cheap packaging material. Where are the alternate bag makers in this race?” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of Confederation of All India Traders, the biggest traders’ organization in Delhi.
The matter is now in the Supreme Court, where plastic manufacturers have said the ban was illegal, as the government did not carry out mandatory public hearing before the ban.
Avishek G Dastidar
New Delhi, May 10, 2010
Plastic bags are back with a vengeance. Shoppers across Delhi are once again going home with colourful plastic bags full of goodies that they’ve bought.
The shopkeepers have also started stocking them again in blatant violation of the plastic bag ban in place since January 2009. The Delhi government, meanwhile, seems to have turned a blind eye to it.
The latest records filed at the courts show that the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) could not spot more than 115 people using or selling plastic bags in the past 15 months in this city of nearly 2 crore people.
“Enforcing the ban in shops and unorganized sectors has been a problem,” admitted Dharmendra Kumar, Delhi Environment Secretary. “We have fined a number of people but we can’t have constant policing.”
With the government dragging its feet on the ban, one of Delhi’s biggest environmental policy interventions in years—after the introduction of Compressed Natural Gas-based public transport a decade ago—has died a slow death.
While the government claimed that the plastic bags had been weeded out of malls, a random check showed markets in Defence Colony, Janak Puri, INA market, Gole Market and Bengali Market were, as expected, teeming with violators.
Apart from grocery stores and sweet shops, meat shops and fruit vendors mushrooming across localities are bringing the bag back in circulation.
The Delhi government, too, goofed up in its reading of the laws governing the ban.
Sources said the DPCC had earlier asked the MCD to fine violators as per the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. But towards the middle of last year, the DPCC realised that the MCD could not fine anyone as the Environment Protection Act, 1986, which governs the ban, empowers only the state pollution boards for the job.
Thanks to this mix up, the MCD’s citywide reach could not be utilised to penalise violators.
“The government does not appear serious about the ban,” said Vinod Jain, the petitioner who had won the long-drawn case against the “plastic lobby” to force the ban on Delhi. Traders, who circulate the bags through their shops, said the government lost out to the well-organised network of the plastic bag manufacturers.
“Every morning, delivery boys come to the markets and deliver the plastic bags. For traders, it is a matter of availability of a cheap packaging material. Where are the alternate bag makers in this race?” said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of Confederation of All India Traders, the biggest traders’ organization in Delhi.
The matter is now in the Supreme Court, where plastic manufacturers have said the ban was illegal, as the government did not carry out mandatory public hearing before the ban.
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Hindustan Times
Don’t waste their efforts
Bharati Chaturvedi
April 14, 2010
The recent fires in Delhi’s Mundka plastic scrapyard and the radioactive leak at the Mayapuri scrap market are a wake-up call for Indian cities to find innovative ways of safe scrap trading.
The scrap trade in Delhi is one of the biggest and most robust in India. Before the ascent of China, in the mid-1990s, it was believed to be one of the biggest trading spots in Asia. Approximately 2,000 tonnes of Delhi’s scrap is recycled here. In addition, waste from Pune also comes here. All of this rests on the work of a giant army of over 80,000 wastepickers, over 25,000 small scrap dealers, a few thousand itinerant buyers and over 50,000 sorters and bailers, apart from e-waste dismantlers.
A World Bank estimate says that over 1 per cent of the population of a big city in the developed world comprises waste recyclers. In India, this sector, predominantly informal, works like a pyramid, with wastepickers at the bottom and the reprocessors at the top, employing over 15 lakh Indians. This is India’s recycling mechanism — driven by the enterprise of the poor who are largely unrecognised and face enormous health risks. It saves huge amounts of money for the various municipalities.
Despite the Delhi incidents, they are a city’s allies, not a nuisance and our policy makers know that. The National Environment Policy, 2006, and the National Action Plan on Climate Change, 2009, both specifically mention the importance of the informal recycling sector and urge government agencies to work with them. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG) report of 2008 indicted some municipalities for making their work harder instead of collaborating with them.
A UN-Habitat report released at the World Urban Forum a few weeks ago points out that informal recycling is a global phenomenon. Policies and research aside, we must work with the recycling sector because of the sheer importance of its work in keeping our cities clean and waste recycled economically. Contrast this with New York, where recycling stopped briefly because of the expense involved. Besides, there are hundreds of urban poor whose livelihoods depend on the recycling industry.
How to make the sector safe? For a start, every municipality must undertake a census, starting with the scrap shops. These shops must be licensed and trained to set up simple fire safety systems. The informal sector finds it hard to invest in fire safety systems if it’s stuck with forced “illegality.” Such shops must be helped to set up a paper trail for all metals, cables, intact items and bulk purchases made. This will help the authorities to track the source of origin of noxious items. They should also have access to authorised help to implement these and other performance standards, and to solve other problems.
But most of all, they need adequate space. Electronic waste is dismantled in the living rooms of the poor because there is no other space. In Delhi, the plots for plastics at Tigri Kalan are tiny. Expecting a scrap shop to move into these is like asking a man wearing size 9 shoes to squeeze into size 5. Besides, small scrap dealers need localised space — nearly six are required for a 100,000 population. In Delhi, the Masterplan 2010 allocates space for recycling but bans junk shops that trade in anything but glass and paper. This is absurd. How can a city indirectly ban recycling — a process the Municipal Waste Rules of 2000 mandate?
The Delhi government has to push for re-drawing a realistic masterplan that enables, not impedes recycling. Only when there is basic livelihood security, and an attempt to draw in these players participatively into their own safety, can we expect to sustainably upgrade their work and green our cities.
Bharati Chaturvedi is Director, Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group, New Delhi
The views expressed by the author are personal
Bharati Chaturvedi
April 14, 2010
The recent fires in Delhi’s Mundka plastic scrapyard and the radioactive leak at the Mayapuri scrap market are a wake-up call for Indian cities to find innovative ways of safe scrap trading.
The scrap trade in Delhi is one of the biggest and most robust in India. Before the ascent of China, in the mid-1990s, it was believed to be one of the biggest trading spots in Asia. Approximately 2,000 tonnes of Delhi’s scrap is recycled here. In addition, waste from Pune also comes here. All of this rests on the work of a giant army of over 80,000 wastepickers, over 25,000 small scrap dealers, a few thousand itinerant buyers and over 50,000 sorters and bailers, apart from e-waste dismantlers.
A World Bank estimate says that over 1 per cent of the population of a big city in the developed world comprises waste recyclers. In India, this sector, predominantly informal, works like a pyramid, with wastepickers at the bottom and the reprocessors at the top, employing over 15 lakh Indians. This is India’s recycling mechanism — driven by the enterprise of the poor who are largely unrecognised and face enormous health risks. It saves huge amounts of money for the various municipalities.
Despite the Delhi incidents, they are a city’s allies, not a nuisance and our policy makers know that. The National Environment Policy, 2006, and the National Action Plan on Climate Change, 2009, both specifically mention the importance of the informal recycling sector and urge government agencies to work with them. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s (CAG) report of 2008 indicted some municipalities for making their work harder instead of collaborating with them.
A UN-Habitat report released at the World Urban Forum a few weeks ago points out that informal recycling is a global phenomenon. Policies and research aside, we must work with the recycling sector because of the sheer importance of its work in keeping our cities clean and waste recycled economically. Contrast this with New York, where recycling stopped briefly because of the expense involved. Besides, there are hundreds of urban poor whose livelihoods depend on the recycling industry.
How to make the sector safe? For a start, every municipality must undertake a census, starting with the scrap shops. These shops must be licensed and trained to set up simple fire safety systems. The informal sector finds it hard to invest in fire safety systems if it’s stuck with forced “illegality.” Such shops must be helped to set up a paper trail for all metals, cables, intact items and bulk purchases made. This will help the authorities to track the source of origin of noxious items. They should also have access to authorised help to implement these and other performance standards, and to solve other problems.
But most of all, they need adequate space. Electronic waste is dismantled in the living rooms of the poor because there is no other space. In Delhi, the plots for plastics at Tigri Kalan are tiny. Expecting a scrap shop to move into these is like asking a man wearing size 9 shoes to squeeze into size 5. Besides, small scrap dealers need localised space — nearly six are required for a 100,000 population. In Delhi, the Masterplan 2010 allocates space for recycling but bans junk shops that trade in anything but glass and paper. This is absurd. How can a city indirectly ban recycling — a process the Municipal Waste Rules of 2000 mandate?
The Delhi government has to push for re-drawing a realistic masterplan that enables, not impedes recycling. Only when there is basic livelihood security, and an attempt to draw in these players participatively into their own safety, can we expect to sustainably upgrade their work and green our cities.
Bharati Chaturvedi is Director, Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group, New Delhi
The views expressed by the author are personal
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
The Hindu, 30 March 2010
Plastic bag ban remains only on paper, says KSPCB chief
Staff Reporter
Bangalore: Despite the ban on plastic bags with less than 20 microns thickness, the State Government has not been able to prevent the use and disposal of this environmentally hazardous material, A.S. Sadashivaiah, Chairman of Karnataka State Pollution Control Board, has said.
Karnataka has failed to regulate the material on two counts — first in preventing the plastic bags from entering the State (either from other States or from local manufacturers); and second, in safely disposing of the material, Mr. Sadashivaiah said on Monday. He was speaking at a national workshop on Plastic Waste Management Strategies for a Clean Environment, organised by the Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology (CIPET).
In Bangalore, for instance, 80 per cent of the 150 tonnes of plastic waste disposed of everyday comprises plastic bags thinner than 20 microns. “This goes unsegregated at the domestic level and is not picked up by waste collectors either as it cannot be recycled,” he said. Mr. Sadashivaiah added that district vigilance teams, made up of environmental officers and headed by Deputy Commissioners, set up to monitor pollution, have been instructed to be “more vigilant” about the use and disposal of plastic bags.
Plastic ‘singled out'
Expressing a rather contrary view, Director-General of CIPET S.K. Nayak said that plastic was being “singled out” as the cause of all environmental woes. “Plastic bags happen to be colourful and fly around, which is probably why they are more conspicuous than other pollutants,” he said. Mr. Nayak added that plastic consumed less energy during production than paper, and produced less greenhouse gases when disposed of. It was important, he said, however, that plastic be managed through the collaborative efforts of the government, private companies and non-government organisations.
Kanwar Pal, Secretary, Department of Ecology and Environment, said that banning plastic was no solution and added that the answer to the menace lay in efficient management and in following the motto of reduce, reuse, recover and recycle. A worrying trend was the burning of plastic as it released harmful chemicals such as and Benzo(a)Pyrene and toxic dioxides.
Staff Reporter
Bangalore: Despite the ban on plastic bags with less than 20 microns thickness, the State Government has not been able to prevent the use and disposal of this environmentally hazardous material, A.S. Sadashivaiah, Chairman of Karnataka State Pollution Control Board, has said.
Karnataka has failed to regulate the material on two counts — first in preventing the plastic bags from entering the State (either from other States or from local manufacturers); and second, in safely disposing of the material, Mr. Sadashivaiah said on Monday. He was speaking at a national workshop on Plastic Waste Management Strategies for a Clean Environment, organised by the Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology (CIPET).
In Bangalore, for instance, 80 per cent of the 150 tonnes of plastic waste disposed of everyday comprises plastic bags thinner than 20 microns. “This goes unsegregated at the domestic level and is not picked up by waste collectors either as it cannot be recycled,” he said. Mr. Sadashivaiah added that district vigilance teams, made up of environmental officers and headed by Deputy Commissioners, set up to monitor pollution, have been instructed to be “more vigilant” about the use and disposal of plastic bags.
Plastic ‘singled out'
Expressing a rather contrary view, Director-General of CIPET S.K. Nayak said that plastic was being “singled out” as the cause of all environmental woes. “Plastic bags happen to be colourful and fly around, which is probably why they are more conspicuous than other pollutants,” he said. Mr. Nayak added that plastic consumed less energy during production than paper, and produced less greenhouse gases when disposed of. It was important, he said, however, that plastic be managed through the collaborative efforts of the government, private companies and non-government organisations.
Kanwar Pal, Secretary, Department of Ecology and Environment, said that banning plastic was no solution and added that the answer to the menace lay in efficient management and in following the motto of reduce, reuse, recover and recycle. A worrying trend was the burning of plastic as it released harmful chemicals such as and Benzo(a)Pyrene and toxic dioxides.
Sunday, 7 March 2010
Times Online March 7th
Aloha! We can clear up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch
Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony Environmental, explains how he can bring back Hawaii’s golden sands
ONCE a five-mile stretch of golden sand, Kamilo beach on the island of Hawaii has become a huge rubbish dump of carrier bags, cigarette lighters, broken toys and other discarded plastic that scars the landscape and could cause lasting damage to the environment.
A British company is aiming to make such detritus a thing of the past. Symphony Environmental has created a substance that can be added to plastic materials to speed up their degradation time from several decades to just a few months.
“We call it superfast biodegradation. All plastic will eventually biodegrade but our technology dramatically accelerates the process,” said Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony.
The litter that washes up on Kamilo mostly comes from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, an area of the ocean estimated by some to be twice the size of Texas, where 100m tonnes of floating plastic rubbish poses a threat to thousands of marine animals.
Symphony, based in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, claims most plastic made with its technology would degrade before it ever reached that part of the world.
The special additive, called d2w, is put into plastic products when they are being manufactured. It works by weakening the carbon bonds, lowering the material’s molecular weight and eventually causing a loss of strength. The plastic can be given a set lifespan, depending on what purpose it is ultimately intended for.
“The point of this is that a bin liner, for example, may require a useful life of 18 months before beginning to lose its strength, whereas a bread bag may require only a few weeks,” said Stephen.
It has been a fight to get the company where it is today.
Founded in 1995, it began creating the technology in partnership with EPI, the environmental products group, in 1998. Their agreement was scrapped in 2003 and EPI tried in the High Court to prevent Symphony going it alone. The claims were dismissed, leaving Symphony free to market and develop its technology.
The recent switch to a licensing model has helped the AIM-listed business make a small profit for the first time. The d2w logo now appears on plastic packaging in 70 countries for companies including Sony and Nokia. In Britain, Barclays, Tesco and JD Sports use Symphony products.
The company has faced stern opposition from rivals. The plastics industry is split into two camps — those that back “oxo-biodegradable” products, such as the d2w range, which break down with exposure to air alone; and those that back “bio-degradable” goods, which rely on specific conditions, such as burial in the ground, to kick-start the process.
“It has been a vicious war and sadly in some cases the bio-producers have convinced British farmers that crop-based plastics are best,” said Stephen. “That is wrong, though, because when they are recycled they give off methane [a potent greenhouse gas].”
He said Symphony is working on a superfast version of its technology that will allow plastics to degrade in less than a month.
Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony Environmental, explains how he can bring back Hawaii’s golden sands
ONCE a five-mile stretch of golden sand, Kamilo beach on the island of Hawaii has become a huge rubbish dump of carrier bags, cigarette lighters, broken toys and other discarded plastic that scars the landscape and could cause lasting damage to the environment.
A British company is aiming to make such detritus a thing of the past. Symphony Environmental has created a substance that can be added to plastic materials to speed up their degradation time from several decades to just a few months.
“We call it superfast biodegradation. All plastic will eventually biodegrade but our technology dramatically accelerates the process,” said Michael Stephen, deputy chairman of Symphony.
The litter that washes up on Kamilo mostly comes from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, an area of the ocean estimated by some to be twice the size of Texas, where 100m tonnes of floating plastic rubbish poses a threat to thousands of marine animals.
Symphony, based in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, claims most plastic made with its technology would degrade before it ever reached that part of the world.
The special additive, called d2w, is put into plastic products when they are being manufactured. It works by weakening the carbon bonds, lowering the material’s molecular weight and eventually causing a loss of strength. The plastic can be given a set lifespan, depending on what purpose it is ultimately intended for.
“The point of this is that a bin liner, for example, may require a useful life of 18 months before beginning to lose its strength, whereas a bread bag may require only a few weeks,” said Stephen.
It has been a fight to get the company where it is today.
Founded in 1995, it began creating the technology in partnership with EPI, the environmental products group, in 1998. Their agreement was scrapped in 2003 and EPI tried in the High Court to prevent Symphony going it alone. The claims were dismissed, leaving Symphony free to market and develop its technology.
The recent switch to a licensing model has helped the AIM-listed business make a small profit for the first time. The d2w logo now appears on plastic packaging in 70 countries for companies including Sony and Nokia. In Britain, Barclays, Tesco and JD Sports use Symphony products.
The company has faced stern opposition from rivals. The plastics industry is split into two camps — those that back “oxo-biodegradable” products, such as the d2w range, which break down with exposure to air alone; and those that back “bio-degradable” goods, which rely on specific conditions, such as burial in the ground, to kick-start the process.
“It has been a vicious war and sadly in some cases the bio-producers have convinced British farmers that crop-based plastics are best,” said Stephen. “That is wrong, though, because when they are recycled they give off methane [a potent greenhouse gas].”
He said Symphony is working on a superfast version of its technology that will allow plastics to degrade in less than a month.
Saturday, 6 March 2010
Latest developments
JAMMU & KASHMIR
Luibeg are delighted to announce that 21st Century Packaging of Delhi – an ISO 9001-2000 Certified Company and major plastic manufacturer has made an important break-through in supplying d2w oxo-biodegradable bags and packaging to a number of customers in Jammu & Kashmir. Through the magnificent efforts of the 21st Century Packaging Team, Luibeg are the first Organization to introduce the oxo- biodegradable technology to this Region.
21st Century Packaging has been supplying d2w products to major customers in Jammu & Kashmir for over 12 months and product samples have been fully and successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the U.K.
Further information will be released shortly regarding the customers who use d2w products.
IN ADDITION
To further our development and prominence in Jammu & Kashmir, Luibeg are very pleased to confirm that we have appointed Swastik Packaging Industries of Jammu as our sole Agent and Distributor for Jammu & Kashmir. The Chairman of this Group, Mr. Pawan K. Shastri has been in the plastic manufacturing industry for many years and is also a Distributor for a major polymer manufacturer. Mr. Shastri has extensive knowledge of the plastic industry and market, and is well acquainted with the manufacturers throughout Jammu & Kashmir. He brings a wealth of experience to our Group and over the past year, has been instrumental in creating awareness of the oxo technology and d2w brand to the State Government and Pollution Board, where extensive discussions and negotiations have been ongoing to ensure that the technology is fully accepted for use in J & K. Swastik Packaging Industries will be using d2w additives in their product manufacturing and have completed trial production runs using d2w and all samples have been successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the UK.
Luibeg are delighted to announce that 21st Century Packaging of Delhi – an ISO 9001-2000 Certified Company and major plastic manufacturer has made an important break-through in supplying d2w oxo-biodegradable bags and packaging to a number of customers in Jammu & Kashmir. Through the magnificent efforts of the 21st Century Packaging Team, Luibeg are the first Organization to introduce the oxo- biodegradable technology to this Region.
21st Century Packaging has been supplying d2w products to major customers in Jammu & Kashmir for over 12 months and product samples have been fully and successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the U.K.
Further information will be released shortly regarding the customers who use d2w products.
IN ADDITION
To further our development and prominence in Jammu & Kashmir, Luibeg are very pleased to confirm that we have appointed Swastik Packaging Industries of Jammu as our sole Agent and Distributor for Jammu & Kashmir. The Chairman of this Group, Mr. Pawan K. Shastri has been in the plastic manufacturing industry for many years and is also a Distributor for a major polymer manufacturer. Mr. Shastri has extensive knowledge of the plastic industry and market, and is well acquainted with the manufacturers throughout Jammu & Kashmir. He brings a wealth of experience to our Group and over the past year, has been instrumental in creating awareness of the oxo technology and d2w brand to the State Government and Pollution Board, where extensive discussions and negotiations have been ongoing to ensure that the technology is fully accepted for use in J & K. Swastik Packaging Industries will be using d2w additives in their product manufacturing and have completed trial production runs using d2w and all samples have been successfully tested by Symphony Environmental Ltd in the UK.
Sunday, 7 February 2010
High Paxton's Blog
More on Killer Plastic – The indigestability of plastic bags.
By Hugh Paxton
“In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!”
Seeing these hideous images of choked seabirds from Midway atoll in your article The Long Arm Of Plastic reminds me to put my mouth where my money is and talk about the merits of biodegradable plastic. The sad fact is that improper disposal of waste plastic is having a very deleterious effect on a lot of wildlife, it is truly an international problem of epic proportions.
Wouldn’t it be awful if the sea turtles which managed to survive the cataclysmic termination of the dinosaurs could be hastened to extinction by plastic bags? Yet that is exactly what is happening.
Many species of sea turtles that munch upon jelly fish for a living are cutting short their sweet lives by choking their alimentary tracts with plastic bags. Sadly, they can’t distinguish between a healthy coelenterate supper and the diaphanous floating billows of plastic bags.
Even if they mistake just 1 in a 1000 meals – the sheer quantity of plastic waste in our oceans coupled with its very slow decomposition, the turtles’ need for a high rate of consumption ( due to the low nutritional content of their jelly-fish prey) and their slow breeding rate means that the odds are stacked heavily against sea turtle survival.
Whether these bags were carelessly dumped or just plucked by the wind from trash cans, heaps, picnic bags or boats matters little to the turtles. What does matter, and this matters a lot, is the size of the jetsam and the amount of time it remains an environmental hazard after it has served its useful purpose to humanity.
Thankfully there is a solution; it is to replace conventional long-lived plastics with plastics that are programmed to biodegrade in about 6 months under normal conditions of careless disposal or on an open rubbish dump!
Symphony Environmental plc add proprietary granules to plastic in the manufacturing process that retain the strength of the plastic during its short span of useful service to mankind and then enable decomposition to set in from exposure to moisture and air when decomposition becomes the new priority.On their website Symphony claims:
“Our d2w® additive put into the plastic at the extrusion stage will make the finished product “oxo-biodegradable” so that it will degrade and disappear in a short timescale, leaving no fragments, no methane and no harmful residues.Degradability is not a disposal option – you can still re-use and recycle – it is low cost insurance against the accumulation of plastic waste in the environment.”
Brilliant.
Symphony franchises its proprietary biodegradable plastic technology internationally and I am happy to say that they are rapidly expanding their operations and now have customers in Europe, North, South and Central America, The Middle East, India and The Far East.
In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!
While I may not have enough shares in Symphony to make much of a financial difference to me, I know that every biodegradable plastic bag that replaces a non-biodegradable one is one less choking hazard for our Chelonian friends.
By Hugh Paxton
“In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!”
Seeing these hideous images of choked seabirds from Midway atoll in your article The Long Arm Of Plastic reminds me to put my mouth where my money is and talk about the merits of biodegradable plastic. The sad fact is that improper disposal of waste plastic is having a very deleterious effect on a lot of wildlife, it is truly an international problem of epic proportions.
Wouldn’t it be awful if the sea turtles which managed to survive the cataclysmic termination of the dinosaurs could be hastened to extinction by plastic bags? Yet that is exactly what is happening.
Many species of sea turtles that munch upon jelly fish for a living are cutting short their sweet lives by choking their alimentary tracts with plastic bags. Sadly, they can’t distinguish between a healthy coelenterate supper and the diaphanous floating billows of plastic bags.
Even if they mistake just 1 in a 1000 meals – the sheer quantity of plastic waste in our oceans coupled with its very slow decomposition, the turtles’ need for a high rate of consumption ( due to the low nutritional content of their jelly-fish prey) and their slow breeding rate means that the odds are stacked heavily against sea turtle survival.
Whether these bags were carelessly dumped or just plucked by the wind from trash cans, heaps, picnic bags or boats matters little to the turtles. What does matter, and this matters a lot, is the size of the jetsam and the amount of time it remains an environmental hazard after it has served its useful purpose to humanity.
Thankfully there is a solution; it is to replace conventional long-lived plastics with plastics that are programmed to biodegrade in about 6 months under normal conditions of careless disposal or on an open rubbish dump!
Symphony Environmental plc add proprietary granules to plastic in the manufacturing process that retain the strength of the plastic during its short span of useful service to mankind and then enable decomposition to set in from exposure to moisture and air when decomposition becomes the new priority.On their website Symphony claims:
“Our d2w® additive put into the plastic at the extrusion stage will make the finished product “oxo-biodegradable” so that it will degrade and disappear in a short timescale, leaving no fragments, no methane and no harmful residues.Degradability is not a disposal option – you can still re-use and recycle – it is low cost insurance against the accumulation of plastic waste in the environment.”
Brilliant.
Symphony franchises its proprietary biodegradable plastic technology internationally and I am happy to say that they are rapidly expanding their operations and now have customers in Europe, North, South and Central America, The Middle East, India and The Far East.
In answer to the rather silly myth that has been promulgated that it isn’t worth using biodegradable materials because modern landfills are fully sealed, the very obvious point should be noted that most plastic bags aren’t ending up in sealed landfills!
While I may not have enough shares in Symphony to make much of a financial difference to me, I know that every biodegradable plastic bag that replaces a non-biodegradable one is one less choking hazard for our Chelonian friends.
Plastics News.com
Oxo-biodegradable additive suppliers rebut critics
By Frank Esposito
PLASTICS NEWS STAFF
Posted February 2, 2010
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Updated Feb. 4, 1:25 p.m. ET) --
A pair of oxo-biodegradable plastic additive makers have fired back at the Society of the Plastics Industry’s Bioplastics Council over claims of biodegradability.
The Bioplastics Council had questioned such claims in a 5-page position paper released Jan. 28, saying that “the issue is one of claiming biodegradation where there is not data to support those claims, or to prove biodegradability as per accepted standards.”
In a Feb. 1 rebuttal, officials with additives maker EPI Environmental Products Inc. of Vancouver, British Columbia, said the Bioplastics Council and a similar European trade group “are inherently biased against competing technologies, and … have once again sought to discredit oxo-biodegradable plastics technology through their ongoing campaign of misinformation and rumor-mongering.”
EPI officials battle on for five pages, disputing the council’s claims and adding several claims defending its own products.
A similar rebuttal from additives maker Symphony Environmental Technologies plc of Borehamwood, England, was less polite.
“The increasingly desperate efforts of the hydro-biodegradable (vegetable-based or ‘compostable’) plastic companies to rubbish oxo-biodegradable plastics are becoming laughable,” Symphony officials said in a Feb. 1 release. “Their latest tactic is to form themselves in the U.S.A. into a very official-sounding organization called the ‘Bioplastics Council’ and to attach it to the respected Society of the Plastics Industry.”
“This ‘Council’ has recently issued a Position Paper which repeats the allegations made against oxo-biodegradable plastics in July 2009 by an organization called ‘European Bioplastics.’ Not surprising really — as they are financed by some of the same companies for the same purpose.”
EPI officials had disputed similar claims made by European Bioplastics in August.
In response to the criticism from EPI and Symphony, the SPI Bioplastics Council issued a statement:
“The SPI Bioplastics Council’s position paper on oxo-biodegradable technologies was drafted with considerable thought and deliberation, and was released on January 28 after extensive review and due diligence. We strongly stand by the position taken, and reiterate that it is the duty of industry to provide consumers with clear information supported by scientific data so that marketing claims do in fact match product results.”
The Bioplastics Council is comprised of eight member companies: Arkema, BASF Corp., Cereplast Inc., DuPont Co., NatureWorks LLC, PolyOne Corp., Teknor Apex and Telles, the joint venture company of Metabolix and Archer Daniels Midland. Seven of those eight — with the exception of Teknor Apex — also are members of European Bioplastics, a trade group formed in 2006.
Two other recycling-focused trade groups – the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) and the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) also have raised concerns about oxo-biodegradable additives. APR in particular has challenged additives producers to produce evidence that their products won’t ultimately weaken products made from recycled resins.
Steve Alexander, executive director of APR, said degradable additives have at least two environmental hurdles to overcome.
“First, do the additives in fact lead to degradation of plastic molecules to carbon dioxide and water? Doubts and claims abound, particularly about timeframes. While such discussions are interesting and necessary, we as citizens wonder if degradation leads to environmental benefit on its own or is degradation an environmental negative and initiation of new environmental issues. We believe the greater environmental benefit and sustainable action is to use the plastic molecule again and not waste it,” Alexander said in a statement.
“Second, and more pertinent to our interests in plastics recycling, we wonder how the additives affect the process of recycling, the making of the next item from recycled plastic, and the service life of the next item, Alexander said. “Premature demise of items made of recycled plastic which contain degradable additives is not helpful. The early failure of some items impacts the reputation of all.”
Alexander said APR is pleased that some companies, such as Symphony, have excluded PET as a targeted resin, and that some are proceeding to test their materials per the APR degradable additives protocol.
By Frank Esposito
PLASTICS NEWS STAFF
Posted February 2, 2010
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Updated Feb. 4, 1:25 p.m. ET) --
A pair of oxo-biodegradable plastic additive makers have fired back at the Society of the Plastics Industry’s Bioplastics Council over claims of biodegradability.
The Bioplastics Council had questioned such claims in a 5-page position paper released Jan. 28, saying that “the issue is one of claiming biodegradation where there is not data to support those claims, or to prove biodegradability as per accepted standards.”
In a Feb. 1 rebuttal, officials with additives maker EPI Environmental Products Inc. of Vancouver, British Columbia, said the Bioplastics Council and a similar European trade group “are inherently biased against competing technologies, and … have once again sought to discredit oxo-biodegradable plastics technology through their ongoing campaign of misinformation and rumor-mongering.”
EPI officials battle on for five pages, disputing the council’s claims and adding several claims defending its own products.
A similar rebuttal from additives maker Symphony Environmental Technologies plc of Borehamwood, England, was less polite.
“The increasingly desperate efforts of the hydro-biodegradable (vegetable-based or ‘compostable’) plastic companies to rubbish oxo-biodegradable plastics are becoming laughable,” Symphony officials said in a Feb. 1 release. “Their latest tactic is to form themselves in the U.S.A. into a very official-sounding organization called the ‘Bioplastics Council’ and to attach it to the respected Society of the Plastics Industry.”
“This ‘Council’ has recently issued a Position Paper which repeats the allegations made against oxo-biodegradable plastics in July 2009 by an organization called ‘European Bioplastics.’ Not surprising really — as they are financed by some of the same companies for the same purpose.”
EPI officials had disputed similar claims made by European Bioplastics in August.
In response to the criticism from EPI and Symphony, the SPI Bioplastics Council issued a statement:
“The SPI Bioplastics Council’s position paper on oxo-biodegradable technologies was drafted with considerable thought and deliberation, and was released on January 28 after extensive review and due diligence. We strongly stand by the position taken, and reiterate that it is the duty of industry to provide consumers with clear information supported by scientific data so that marketing claims do in fact match product results.”
The Bioplastics Council is comprised of eight member companies: Arkema, BASF Corp., Cereplast Inc., DuPont Co., NatureWorks LLC, PolyOne Corp., Teknor Apex and Telles, the joint venture company of Metabolix and Archer Daniels Midland. Seven of those eight — with the exception of Teknor Apex — also are members of European Bioplastics, a trade group formed in 2006.
Two other recycling-focused trade groups – the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) and the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) also have raised concerns about oxo-biodegradable additives. APR in particular has challenged additives producers to produce evidence that their products won’t ultimately weaken products made from recycled resins.
Steve Alexander, executive director of APR, said degradable additives have at least two environmental hurdles to overcome.
“First, do the additives in fact lead to degradation of plastic molecules to carbon dioxide and water? Doubts and claims abound, particularly about timeframes. While such discussions are interesting and necessary, we as citizens wonder if degradation leads to environmental benefit on its own or is degradation an environmental negative and initiation of new environmental issues. We believe the greater environmental benefit and sustainable action is to use the plastic molecule again and not waste it,” Alexander said in a statement.
“Second, and more pertinent to our interests in plastics recycling, we wonder how the additives affect the process of recycling, the making of the next item from recycled plastic, and the service life of the next item, Alexander said. “Premature demise of items made of recycled plastic which contain degradable additives is not helpful. The early failure of some items impacts the reputation of all.”
Alexander said APR is pleased that some companies, such as Symphony, have excluded PET as a targeted resin, and that some are proceeding to test their materials per the APR degradable additives protocol.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
